and to reply to your putting him down i would not have and of the animals and beautiful corn snakes have the right to live i know he might not live long but i would do my best to keep him alive and happy as long as he would have wanted it would have been my pleasure to keep him happy and satisfied
Unless that snake hatched out and was full of life and vinegar, I would have put it down, as well. I don't allow severely deformed hatchlings to live...you and I have no way of knowing what sort of pain and/or suffering the animal could be going through. Not everyone feels the same as my self and Triple Moons on this aspect, but it is a matter of opinion.
I have seen people struggle and fight with deformed hatchlings, "giving them a chance", when in reality...that animal is most likely in pain. When there are severe physical deformities present on the outside, it is a very reasonable assumption that there are severe physical deformities on the inside. Some would choose to allow the snake a chance at life, others would prefer to end the suffering before it truly begins. TripleMoons and I will disagree on ALOT of things...but on this...I agree with her 100%.
As for the d.i.e. baby being a candy cane...probably not. It is more likely that it died before it finished developing, and it's true coloration wasn't showing. As well, corns continue to develope coloration for a good few years after hatching. When dealing with linebred looks, it is best to wait until they develope before labeling them, unless you have been working the project long enough to have a fair amount of consistancy in the reproduction of the look. "Looks" or phases are a matter of opinion, for the most part. Certainly there are specific attributes one can expect to see from a specific look. But one person's CandyCane is another person's amel. I hatched an amel motley this year that many (on other forums and in person) have referred to as a "sunglow"(another line-bred amel look), but I will not refer to it as such because I can't be sure. Her parents were an anery motley het amel/hypo/caramel X normal het. amel/motley. VERY unlikely that I could produce a sunglow motley from the pairing...but she certainly has the chance at developing into a nice one, and as such...she is a keeper.
As an example to incomplete developement...I had a dead in the egg baby this year that I cut open to see what it was, and there inside was a fully striped ghost corn. The only problem with that is...the stripe gene is not present in either of the parents. It was either an anomoly of the motley gene(of which both parents were homozygous), or incomplete developement. No way to know for certain, but my guess would be incomplete developement as this was a perfect pair of stripes exactly as one would expect to hatch from a homo. striped pairing. It is highly unlikely that my two motleys were able to produce a baby that mutated enough in pattern to produce a perfect, fully striped pattern.
TME-
Of course you're right that the chances are very little...but still it is a chance. I also agree that I, personally, would refrain from labeling any animal with a linebred term until it has developed enough to be positive, or bred by myself for long enough to be consistent. You and I have both seen very poor examples of linebred looks, and it bothers me at times. I was only making the clarification as a matter of genetics. Genetically, it is absolutely possible, and that is the point I wanted to make. It was an attempt to clarify, though I fear I may have only added to the confusion...
