• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Nine teens charged with bullying in teen's suicide

Chris, I can see by your presence that your absence is overstated.

You have a tendency to exaggerate some statements and to minimize others to create you elaborate arguments. Let me give you an example:
OK...but saying that "typical schoolyard bullying" should be criminalized isn't a gross exaggeration?

I see your point, wade, but there are others in this "debate" taking just as extreme of an exaggerated stance opposite. Yet that seems perfectly fine. Perhaps it's because you agree with them and not me? I'm just saying...

Now surely even you can understand that we are not talking about children picking on each other here as you would imply. And try as I might I can’t see anywhere that Dinah implied that children should have criminal records for picking on each other.
Yes, I understand that. And surely you can understand that trying to make my defense of "schoolyard bullies" appear as a defense of terrorists is just as ridiculous, no? Surely you read the part where I said that schoolyard bullies SHOULD be punished, just not criminally, and also where I said that crossing the line to criminal stalking and terrorizing deserves criminal punishment? You did read that, right? You should have...I said it multiple times...

You did this with you opening statement where you tried to make it out that he bad guys were just misunderstood and this young girl was at fault.[/qwuote]
Really? Where in my opening statement did I say the bullies were blameless and this was all the little girl's fault? Please, show me those words in ANY statement that I have made...

It is really difficult to have an intelligent conversation with someone who wants to keep changing the facts and then argue about the changes. You like to interpret what everyone says and then complain about your interpretation. It would be really interesting to watch you present an argument in a court of law or in a debate conversation where you actually had to deal with what was said instead of what you dreamed up.
What facts have I changed? What facts do we have? It's a little tough to "change" what isn't known, don't you think? I mean, in order for me to "change the facts", I would actually have to have something other than:
A-she killed herself
B-she was bullied
C-there are potential criminal charges, though we have no idea upon what activities those charges are based
:shrugs:

Sorry you won’t be here any longer to play…
Well...you're here. And bugging you is my goal in life so...here I am!
 
I know you think you have me pinned because OMG who wants kids to have criminal records, but I am not ashamed to admit it. If a person ANY person kid or not, breaks the law and torments another person, especially if it is ongoing and does not stop after a detention or a typical type of punishment, then YES they deserve a criminal record because they are in fact criminals. They are breaking the law and abusing their fellow citizens and as a society we should say NO IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO TREAT PEOPLE THAT WAY.
Have you pinned? That would imply that my goal is to change your mind. That's a ridiculous goal to have. I don't really care what your opinion is, nor do I care what definitions you pull out of wikipedia. At this point, I am merely responding to the individuals that seem to think I am defending criminal behavior.

Second yes all kids will from time to time hurl an insult or call a name, however swift action must be taken to stop it before it goes on and becomes bullying. But no not ALL kids bully, most kids are actually quite sweet natured, with only the occasional attitude.
[sarcasm]OK. So let's arrest all the kids that regularly and routinely call other kid's names and maybe push one once in a while. That oughtta solve all the world's problems.[/sarcasm]

Look...we don't know what these 9 kids actually did to get these charges. I have seen statutory rape charges pressed on people for some pretty ridiculous stuff. *Most* of the time it is a very serious charge. But the article makes no mention of the activities that led to these charges, only that they have been charged.

You assume the worst of the 9 kids. Fine. I assume the worst of the school administrators and those charged with protecting this child. But we both make assumptions in order to even discuss this case because there are no facts to present.

Yes if a kid goes to school everyday with a bad attitude and insults their fellow classmates everyday then yes they deserve a punishment at the very least. We should not allow bullies to hold our schools hostage, because it is very difficult for teachers to teach and kids can't learn in a hostile environment. I think if as a student you are creating said hostile environment, then you should be removed so everyone else can get down to the business of learning. If you cannot reform your behavior and you continue to bully people then yes you are a criminal.
I agree with the first half, but for your last statement...please, if you will, define where the line is drawn between criminal behavior and disruptive behavior. Define when a child progresses from being a nuisance to being a criminal.

Is it based on age? Is it based on which words the child uses as insults? Is it based on the number of times the child is found to be disruptive? Is it based on verbal vs. physical? You tell me where the line is drawn.

Than, after you draw the line, you show me in the articles where these 89 kids being charged crossed the line. Try as I might I can't find any mention of what, sopecifically, these kids did for their charges. I am willing to assume that the charges are legitimate, but I am not willing to assume that they are worthy of actual criminal prosecution because I do not know what their actions were...and neither do you.

You are welcome to be mean and totally out of line and insult my ability to read if you wish...what goes around comes around so I know you will get yours in the end.
I insulted you? You're too sensitive. I didn't insult you, I told you that if you actually read the words I used, instead of assuming my intent based on a pre-concieved idea of what you THINK I am going to write, you wouldn't get so angry.

If that's an insult, than I fully understand why you would wish to criminalize any schoolyard bully...

Bullying is abuse no matter what you personally choose to believe and by downplaying it you are in fact downplaying abuse (just google 'is bullying abuse') . Regularly verbally assaulting someone can have just as serious of consequences as if the abuse where physical. A child who is regularly verbally insulting to their classmates is a bully and bullying/harassment is a crime, so it doesn't really matter what you believe. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and beliefs. It is my opinion that the sky is purple but that doesn't make it so.
Bullying is not always abuse. There are vastly varying degrees of bullying, and most of them never become criminal in their intent OR their actions. Sure...occasionally it does. And those kids deserve criminal punishments. But the vast majority of "bullying" *should*(IMO) be dealt with with school discipline, not criminal records.

I agree that regular verbal taunting from classmates can be incredibly painful and detrimental to the developement of young people. This is where parents and school admninistrators need to pick up the line, protect the children, and give them the necessary tools to deal with these issues, rather than coddling them over a few words and creating another generation of over-sensitive, easily offended, "the world revolves around me", spoiled rotten kids.

Ultimately, the world is not a nice place. People are not required by law to be nice. It is not criminal to be mean. I don't care what wikipedia says, it simnply is not criminal to be mean. It's not nice, but...it's not criminal either.
 
Dinah, I am sorry. I kind of encouraged you to speak your mind yesterday. And I think you are doing a wonderful job. I just didn't factor in having to try to remain rational with an irrational opponent. Don't take it to heart. There are intelligent people here reading this and they all see the merit in what you are saying.
 
Dinah, I am sorry. I kind of encouraged you to speak your mind yesterday. And I think you are doing a wonderful job. I just didn't factor in having to try to remain rational with an irrational opponent. Don't take it to heart. There are intelligent people here reading this and they all see the merit in what you are saying.

Wade - you know I love you, but seriously...I do see merit in statements by both parties here and some of this lowballing stuff is getting out of hand from everyone.
 
That poor girl. Her poor parents. What a pointless waste of life. I hope those who inflicted such misery get their just rewards, regardless of any charges I hope the consequences haunt them. The people in loco parentis, who were supposed to give her a safe school environment, maybe they will act harder to prevent such tragedies in the future
 
I don't really care what your opinion is, nor do I care what definitions you pull out of wikipedia. At this point, I am merely responding to the individuals that seem to think I am defending criminal behavior.


[sarcasm]OK. So let's arrest all the kids that regularly and routinely call other kid's names and maybe push one once in a while. That oughtta solve all the world's problems.[/sarcasm]


You assume the worst of the 9 kids. Fine. I assume the worst of the school administrators and those charged with protecting this child. But we both make assumptions in order to even discuss this case because there are no facts to present.


I agree with the first half, but for your last statement...please, if you will, define where the line is drawn between criminal behavior and disruptive behavior. Define when a child progresses from being a nuisance to being a criminal.
Is it based on age? Is it based on which words the child uses as insults? Is it based on the number of times the child is found to be disruptive? Is it based on verbal vs. physical? You tell me where the line is drawn.

Than, after you draw the line, you show me in the articles where these 89 kids being charged crossed the line. Try as I might I can't find any mention of what, sopecifically, these kids did for their charges. I am willing to assume that the charges are legitimate, but I am not willing to assume that they are worthy of actual criminal prosecution because I do not know what their actions were...and neither do you.


I insulted you? You're too sensitive. I didn't insult you, I told you that if you actually read the words I used, instead of assuming my intent based on a pre-concieved idea of what you THINK I am going to write, you wouldn't get so angry.

If that's an insult, than I fully understand why you would wish to criminalize any schoolyard bully...


Bullying is not always abuse. There are vastly varying degrees of bullying, and most of them never become criminal in their intent OR their actions. Sure...occasionally it does. And those kids deserve criminal punishments. But the vast majority of "bullying" *should*(IMO) be dealt with with school discipline, not criminal records.
I agree that regular verbal taunting from classmates can be incredibly painful and detrimental to the developement of young people. This is where parents and school admninistrators need to pick up the line, protect the children, and give them the necessary tools to deal with these issues, rather than coddling them over a few words and creating another generation of over-sensitive, easily offended, "the world revolves around me", spoiled rotten kids.


Ultimately, the world is not a nice place. People are not required by law to be nice. It is not criminal to be mean. I don't care what wikipedia says, it simnply is not criminal to be mean. It's not nice, but...it's not criminal either.

You did say that if there wasn't physical abuse then the bullies should not be criminally charged. And bullying/harassment are criminal behaviors even "just" the verbal kinds. So if you do not want to be perceived as defending criminal behavior, then stop defending criminal behavior. Abuse and harassment are criminal behaviors even if there is no physical contact.

You can have sarcasm font all you want but yes kids who regularly abuse and bully other kids should be stopped and if it is not remedied by punishment in the beginning and it turns into something more than an isolated incident, then it is a crime.


If you think I assume the worst about the bullies then you are wrong read my first post in this thread I spent 5 paragraphs talking about how much blame there is to go around and talking about what everyone could have done. While I do most certainly believe that you have to be accountable for your own actions, I believe that if the grown up in this situation had been doing their jobs the bullying would have never made it to a point this severe. But if the kids parents are not going to teach them how to behave in society and if the school cannot or wont then someone does have to teach them that this is not ok so SADLY it falls to law enforcement. I have said several times that when it first starts or at least when adults first hear about it that is when punishments and strategies need to be put into place to keep an insult from turning in to a reoccurring bullying situation.

I am not going to waste a bunch of space arguing semantics regarding where bullying starts, the definition has been posted already. AN insult is different from repeated insults and verbal assaults day in and day out. I actually can read just fine and I personally found the definition to be quite clear.

Questioning a persons ability to read, because you are in a debate with them is mean and it is a insulting,. No I do not think that makes you a criminal, while I did bring it to your attention because I do think it is wrong, I have never asked you to stop it and in terms of how you treat me this is a very isolated occurrence. Now if you were to continue to harass me and insult me day in and day out, then that might be a different story

I am a sensitive person but it is not up to you or to anyone else to decide for me how sensitive I should be. I get to decide who I am as a person whether you like it or not. I personally LOVE being sensitive, I am always the first person to notice when birds sing, I am the first person to notice when the spring flowers bloom, I am the first person to notice when a friend of mine looks or acts upset all because I am sensitive. You can say "too sensitive" like its a bad thing, but actually being sensitive is an absolutely WONDERFUL thing, that I do not plan to change any time soon....so get used to it or ignore me, that would be your choice.

I do not want to criminalize a school yard bully, I want for parents and teachers to put a stop to incidents right away so that an insult never develops into a case of full fledged bullying, but if a person does still continue harassing people and does continue to be abusive despite efforts to stop them, then yes they are behaving criminally and they should be stopped.

I think it is terrible that you consider the world to be "not a nice place." I love my world. Almost all of the time the people I come in contact with are pleasant and kind. My world is almost always a lovely place. I guess it all depends on how you look at things.

It is not criminal to be mean that is true. If a person asks you for directions it is legal for you to tell them to take a hike, you do not have to be nice and give them directions. But being mean is different from being a bully.
 
Wade - you know I love you, but seriously...I do see merit in statements by both parties here and some of this lowballing stuff is getting out of hand from everyone.

I agree. I have gotten the impression that Chris is advocating for recognizing the difference between ordinary schoolyard "stuff", which is wrong but not worthy of criminal records, and more severe bad behavior. I have also gotten the impression he is saying that bullying alone would be unlikely to drive a child to suicide unless the child had other problems, like mental health issues. I am not sure he is right, but he makes a valid point. Several people here have posted about severe bullying, stalking, & abuse they experienced, but they are still alive. There may well be some underlying issues that tip the balance causing one child to hang on, albeit with emotional and/or physical scars, and another child to commit suicide. Chris also made a point that I think is REALLY GOOD -- the ADULTS failed the girl in South Hadley. And they did.

So can we all simmer down please?
 
I have crossed swords with Chris on a number of occasions and sometimes we lose site of the topic and focus too much on the battle itself. I know that and so does Chris. But then, I think that is why we lay in wait for each other, we enjoy the battle.

I don’t think anyone will leave this battlefield with permanent scars. I appreciate those who have tried to calm down the participants but I think everyone enveloped is doing ok.
 
Teenage suicide is a huge problem. I taught in public high schools and on the university level for 10 years. During that time I saw 4 young people die at their own hand. That is shattering. The causes and reasons are so far reaching and different for every person involved that it is foolish for us to sit here and try to second guess what happened to this particular young lady. What ever was going on was significant enough that she felt there was no way out. Weather you or I agree with that makes no difference.

My son had a friend named Jason. They were best friends all through school. This kid came from a good home, great parents, had several brothers and sisters. Upper class family financially. Active in their church. All the good things. He was very out going, he and my boy were inseparable. The hunted and fished and camped out. Did all the things kids should do.

When Jason was 16 he fell in love with a girl named Joanie. Cute girl. I kind of had a crush on her too. She became the third to Jason and my son and they went everywhere together. You have never seen such a group. Well as teenage love is there came a time when Joanie found another. She broke up with Jason. He tried several times to put it back together but it was just not to be. Very sad.

One night I was watching television and my son came running into the den and said “Dad, Jason is going to kill himself, what should I do”. I tried to calm him down but he was adamant, Jason had called him to say good bye and thank him for being such a good friend. Well I couldn’t calm my boy down so he and I got in my truck and went out to find Jason. We drove around for about an hour before we spotted his car along side the road. I pull up along side it. My boy jump out of the truck and ran around the car, there on the other side of the car sat Jason, leaning against a tire. He had shot himself in the head.

Nobody, not one person saw this coming. Not his parents, teachers, friends, nobody. This kid was in my house 3 or 4 hours a day every day of the week for 15 years and I had no idea he was down. My son and Joanie both spent a year in therapy. Jason’s family is still not right.

Don’t ever get the idea that you are so smart you can say they should have done this and they should of done that and it’s all that guys fault. You are not that smart and neither is anyone eles.
 
The American Psychological Association lists suicidal thoughts as one of the psychological effects of being Bullied.

http://www.apa.org/about/gr/issues/cyf/bullying-briefing.aspx

And that is why I said I am not sure Chris is right. But not EVERY child who is severely bullied develops suicidal thoughts. So there MAY be more to the suicidal thoughts than just bullying, or there may not.

Wade, the story of your friend's son is just tragic. I am so sorry! It illustrates a good point, that not all teens give warning signs of suicidal feelings before acting on them, or only brief ones. You did not fail that kid, in fact, you took your son's statement so seriously you drove around for an hour trying to help!

In the South Hadley case, though, there were adults who KNEW beforehand that the girl was being severely bullied. Chris's point about adults failing does apply there, as apparently none of those adults took action. Many teen suicides DO include adult failures to help, and that needs to be understood. The teenage bullies are not the ONLY ones to blame, the adults who knew & did not act also deserve a nice big heap of blame.
 
And that is why I said I am not sure Chris is right. But not EVERY child who is severely bullied develops suicidal thoughts. So there MAY be more to the suicidal thoughts than just bullying, or there may not.

Certainly bullying, in not the only thing that ever leads to suicide and certainly being bullied does not automatically lead to suicide. And of course not every child with suicidal thoughts is or has ever been bullied. I was just just wanting to post the link so that everyone could have access to the info. Neither myself nor Tyflier are psychologists (actually I don't know what ty does), but since there seems to be some debate as to whether 'just' bullying can lead a kid to suicide, I figured I would check with the professionals. The American Psychological Association seems to feel that at the very least 'just' bullying can lead to thoughts of suicide.
 
And that is why I said I am not sure Chris is right. But not EVERY child who is severely bullied develops suicidal thoughts. So there MAY be more to the suicidal thoughts than just bullying, or there may not.

I think it's the natural range of sensitivity among people. What's normal stress and quite tolerable to one person is unbearable to another. This is not wrong, just variation among individuals.
 
I too am very sorry your son had to witness such a tragedy, and I'm glad that he got the counseling he needed to help him deal with it.

I just want to make one point of clarification regarding the charge of statutory rape. This girl was 14 and had a sexual relationship with the senior boy. I don't know his other involvement in this case, but I do feel it would be a crime to have him labeled as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

As to the bullying itself...the whole thing is horrible, from the victim to the attackers to the parents and faculty who did not take action. This poor girl came from Ireland. She was in a new country, a new culture, no friends and her father was still in her country. They flew her remains home because her parents wanted an ocean between her and her attackers. These girls then went online and bragged about their victory at showing this girl "her place." She had the audacity to come to their turf and start dating the star football player. If you google "untouchable mean girls" you get some of the details. I think they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent.

I am so fortunate that my sons' school has a zero tolerance policy. Bully someone on the bus, you're off for a week. Second offence and you're off for a year. Too bad if your parents work and have to take time to get you to school and home after. Bully at school and plan to be sent home. Do it again and get a longer vacation and then spend months of recess time in the guidance counselor's office. And this is just K-4th grade! They also have several programs throughout the year teaching kids why they shouldn't do it, and how to cope if they are bullied themselves. I have never seen a school so full of kids that actually respect themselves, their peers AND their teachers. It's unfortunate that their school is an exception rather than the norm for all schools.
 
I think it's the natural range of sensitivity among people. What's normal stress and quite tolerable to one person is unbearable to another. This is not wrong, just variation among individuals.

You are absolutely right! Very good point.
 
I just want to make one point of clarification regarding the charge of statutory rape. This girl was 14 and had a sexual relationship with the senior boy. I don't know his other involvement in this case, but I do feel it would be a crime to have him labeled as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

That is helpful info, a high schooler dating another high schooler should not end up with kid being labeled a sex offender just because they decide to have a consensual sexual relationship, and if that is what happened then I hope the statutory rape charges do not stand. However if there was force or if the statutory rape charge is from something else then that is different. Also I guess it kind of depends on why he had sex with her, was was it as a part of their relationship or was it done to lead her on and to create further ammo to pick on her with? As everyone has said not all of the info is available just in a couple of articles. But I do agree if the girl had a consensual relationship with her boyfriend (and they were both in high school) and that is it then he should not be charged with rape of any sort. A senior dating and having sex with a freshman is not the same thing as an adult dating and having sex with a minor.
 
That is helpful info, a high schooler dating another high schooler should not end up with kid being labeled a sex offender just because they decide to have a consensual sexual relationship, and if that is what happened then I hope the statutory rape charges do not stand. However if there was force or if the statutory rape charge is from something else then that is different. Also I guess it kind of depends on why he had sex with her, was was it as a part of their relationship or was it done to lead her on and to create further ammo to pick on her with? As everyone has said not all of the info is available just in a couple of articles. But I do agree if the girl had a consensual relationship with her boyfriend (and they were both in high school) and that is it then he should not be charged with rape of any sort. A senior dating and having sex with a freshman is not the same thing as an adult dating and having sex with a minor.
According to The Untouchable Mean Girls article, she became a target because she had a brief fling with a senior, so they decided to make her pay.
 
Back
Top