Many have missed Lauren's point. Lauren's point was not that life never changes after you've gone to college and have thought you'd settled down. Of course it does. Lauren's point was that when you're in high school, it is almost INEVITABLE (we hope it is, anyway) that life will change and that you haven't settled down. Getting lots of pets always ties you down, but if you're in a situation where you thought you were tied down anyway, it is understandable when you have to make adjustments when you find out things have to change. Getting lots of pets when you KNOW thinks will soon be changing is a different scenario. Getting lots of pets when I think I have a stable job and am going to live in the same spot for a while is totally different from getting a lot of new pets when I know I'm leaving for the field in a year. If people had seen ME acquiring lots of pets when I knew I was going to go where I couldn't care for them myself in a couple of years, they'd say, "Hey, Stephanie, uh, have you got plans for who's caring for that when you go away?" And they'd be perfectly justified in doing so.
And with regard to the analogy about how adults get a dog and then realize they're in over their heads, everyone here would be every bit as up-at-arms about it if they heard about an adult getting two, and three, and four puppies before seeing if they could really take care of one dog. People would say, "Hey, slow down. I think you're getting in over your head." And if their entreaties were ignored, they'd have every right to say, "I told you so" when the person took the dogs to the pound. No one has a problem with people selling snakes. People have a problem with warning people they're getting in over their heads (because they know how it can happen, and they are damn smart and they can see when it IS happening), being ignored, seeing the people they warned selling off lots of their animals, and the people they warned pretending nothing was ever an issue--that they never made irresponsible decisions.
And many have missed Lennycorn's point. Lennycorn was pointing out that David's, "But my situation is special, Lauren, because I have a job in reptiles and know what I'm doing, and after all I don't have very many pets," post was disingenuous, because his pet count was artificially low with regard to the present conversation, because he'd just lost some the week before due to a high-risk heating set-up that he wasn't able to check daily (because maybe he got himself in over his head early on and then his situation changed in ways he can't control because he's a kid, which exacerbated that situation). Anyone with a brain can see that implying, "I only have x, so the criticisms leveled here don't relate to me" is completely disingenuous when the week before the person stating that had x+y and the y were lost in the interim due to what some would consider irresponsible care. THAT'S what Lennycorn was pointing out. He wasn't pointing out David's loss to torture him, he was pointing out David's loss because he thought David's comment smelled funny, and he was saying exactly what he thought it smelled like. (I, myself, was very late to this thread, had the SAME thought when I saw the post, and would have posted similarly had I not then discovered that Lennycorn had already done so.)