I'm just offering another perspective and I even specifically said that it was my opinion. The fact of the matter is that no two humans are exactly the same, and this includes how our bodies process the foods we eat. Not everyone will do well on a vegetarian diet, and not everyone will do well eating meat. All I'm saying is that there are multiple factors and variables to consider when it comes to how healthy it is to eat a vegetarian diet and it's not productive to make blanket statements either way.
I am guessing the lack of proper tone and facial cues are making my statements somehow lost in translation. As I said in my post " I am not asking you to believe me." and "I provided enough information regarding my source for you to be able to look into it yourself." The message I am trying to convey here is that I am not trying to make you agree with me, I am just trying to provide the information that I have, so that other people can take that information weigh it for themselves and make their own personal decisions. I am trying to word my posts so that I do not come across as angry, frustrated, attacking, etc because I am none of those things. Really!
I did not ever say that everyone would always do well eating a vegetarian diet. In fact I did say at least twice that there are certian conditions/circumstances where an all vegetarian diet would not be the most appropriate. In post 90 I said (sorry I only know how to quote one post at a time) "It is true that some people can have rare conditions that make proper absorption difficult and they may need supplements or perhaps some meat." and again in post 103 "a vegetarian diet can be completely balanced and healthy (for all but rare circumstances)" So I have to be honest I am quite confussed as to why you think I am making blanket statements about vegetarians diets somehow always being good for everyone.
I did say that the claim by tyflier in post 89
"One good thing that would come of it...our global population density would decrease dramatically because quite frankly, we, as omnivorous creatures, simply cannot and will not thrive on a vegetarian diet without supplemental nutritional medication. So if the entire world became vegetarian and/or vegan overnight, we would see a DRASTIC reduction in global population due to malnutrition, immuno-compromise diseases, traumatic injury due to calcium and protein deficiencies, and a HUGE increase in the infant mortality rate."
is false according to the nutrition book which makes it very clear that most of the time a properly balanced vegetarian diet is healthy and can actually have a great many benefits.
To be honest I see tyfliers post to be of an unfounded/blanket statement than anything that I have said. But also as I said already, I really do not think that ty was attempting to be misleading, in any way (see post 105 reason b).
In regards to your last statement about "there are multiple factors and variables to consider when it comes to how healthy it is to eat a vegetarian diet " I agree. Here are some of them to consider. According to the same source listed before. I am only hoping to inform/counter some of the previous statements by everyone that somehow being a vegetarian is unhealthy, and put out some of the variables for people to consider. I am not saying these are the only variables just these are the facts that I have
pro's
"In general vegetarians maintain a healthier body weight than non vegetarians." p209
"Vegetarians tend to have lower blood pressure and lower rates of hypertensions than non begetarians." p209
"The incidence of heart disease and related deaths is much lower for vegetarians than for non vegetarians." p209
"Vegetarians have a significantly lower rate of cancer than the general population." p209
"Even when their intake of energy, protien, carbohydrates, total fat, saturated fat, unsaturated fat, alcohol, and fiber are the same, people eating meals based on tofu have lower blood cholesterol and triglyceride levels than those eating meat." p209
And last but not least "well planned vegetarian diets offer sound nutrition and health benefits" p209
cons
Due to the way the book is set up the cons are not as easily quoted in snippets like I did above. So many apologies but you will all have to make do with me summing them up
The book is most concerned with adequate Iron, calcium, vitamin D, B12 and Zinc, although the books straight up says that these things can all be acquired in sufficient quantities by eating legumes, nuts, seeds, peanut butter, tempeh, tofu, soy milk, and dark green vegetable. p209
Special consideration is given in the book to sensitive times in development.
pregnancy is the first mentioned and the book in that case the worry is about iron energy (kcals). Most pregnant women are given vitamins to take because even meat eating women typically do not have enough iron during pregnancy, and the book feels that is adequate for vegetarian moms to be as well. plus many things provide iron other than meat. p211
Infancy is the next sensitive time, and the book clearly states that a well nourished vegetarian mother provides plenty of nutrition to her nursing baby, and that Soy baby formula also provides appropriate nutrition to babies for mom's who choose that route. p211-212
Childhood/Adolescence is the third sensitive time, the book says that a well planned vegetarian diet can easily provide adequate nutrition intakes for growing children, still I put this in con because obviously when you have a growing child Well Planned cannot be stressed enough. They also say that vegetarian children's growth is similar to that of their non vegetarian peers. p.212
They do say that babies who are switching to solid foods in a vegan family, may grow more slowly due to getting full to soon(because these types of foods tend to be more filling), although even there they list ways to prevent that and the types of more energy dense foods avocado as well as continuing them on infant cereals and soy formula to name just few of the ways to overcome this potential con and to help increase the number of calories they are consuming while they grow.p212
It says that vegan children are sometimes shorter/lighter than their peers due to again getting full before enough calories are consumed, and that vegans can have lower bone density, however they also say that with proper diet planning including fortified cereals, etc the nutritional needs of a child can be meet.p212
The wrap up sentences of the section say "Quite simply, the negative health aspects of any diet (meat/vegetarian/vegan are the ones being addressed), reflect poor diet planning. Careful attention to energy intake and specific problem nutrients can ensure adequacy." p212-213
Now please do not think that just because I provided said info that I am advocating for everyone to become vegetarian. Me and my family eat meat. I am interested in this subject on a facts/intellectual basis. I am not here to tell other people that what they choose to do with their lives is any of my business. But at the same time I am pesky about proper information. And it does bother me to see people saying that we will suffer huge population decreases if people stop eating meat as though it is just not possible to get proper nutrition without meat because whether you choose to be vegetarian or not for most people it can be a very health dietary option.