• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Studies on dog behavior!

Now, I'm going to say, "I work with man aggressive dogs, most of them are rejects from personal protection/police K9 programs because they display severe handler aggression. If you do not show these dogs you mean business from day one, and if you do not get after them physically, they will eat you and your babies. They have extremely hard and aggressive temperaments due to their breeding."
Due to their breeding? or due to being forced into high stress training, shown no real love and affection since day one, and then cast away by humans to be thrown to another who will try physical domination and negative reinforcement as well?
You can blame breeding all you want, but these dogs would learn how to trust people if they were properly trained from an early age.
 
**ouch** Really, **ouch** that's your **ouch** response?! **ouch** Funny stuff!! **ouch**

:roflmao:
**ouch**
D80
**ouch**
You're right. At least she provided some form of insight in her posts, I shouldn't have left you out like that. TROLL!!!
 
Emily, a little word of advice... It's hard to listen to any point you are trying to make, especially a long one, when you start it off with "Your narrow mindedness is tragic.". Seriously, most of your post was filled with unnecessary sarcasm and ridicule, and it makes anything you are trying to say sound extreme, and unpleasant to read.
You can use as many four syllable words you want, and describe every ear twitch and drop of dew on the grass, and I still can't appreciate what you're saying because it's marred with your underlying arrogance and criticism.

You'll notice I didn't start off with ridicule, but when you make ridiculous claims, well... it's hard to keep it out. However, sometimes it just gets to me. Frankly, I've had enough. And I don't play the "Wah wah, this person's not playing nice! You're a meany - NO, YOU'RE a meany!" games.

So if my post offended you, I'm sorry. You struck on many of my pet peeves (it's not your training style, if you're wondering). I won't post them here for fear of it being construed as a personal attack. I will try to reign in the nasty; however, I stand by everything I said.
 
Due to their breeding? or due to being forced into high stress training, shown no real love and affection since day one, and then cast away by humans to be thrown to another who will try physical domination and negative reinforcement as well?
You can blame breeding all you want, but these dogs would learn how to trust people if they were properly trained from an early age.

Due to their breeding. These are not pet dogs. I am talking about dogs who are bred to higher aggression levels.

I'm not here to get into it, it was an example anyway. If you'd like to discuss it, I honestly just suggest you sign up at www.workingdogforum.com and read read read. You will learn a lot about the dogs that become K9 units. Firstly that they do receive plenty of love and early, VERY positive training, but because of their genetics, if they feel wronged or superior to you, they do not hesitate to aggress. This does not go for ALL K9 unit dogs, of course, but some.

Like I said, if you want to discuss it further, PM me and I'd be happy to.
 
It is buy and large a myth that police K9's are still trained by the ass-kicking method. Most are trained primarily positive and in prey drive. Kicking a dog's butt just kills his confidence in man work.
 
You'll notice I didn't start off with ridicule, but when you make ridiculous claims, well... it's hard to keep it out. However, sometimes it just gets to me. Frankly, I've had enough. And I don't play the "Wah wah, this person's not playing nice! You're a meany - NO, YOU'RE a meany!" games.

So if my post offended you, I'm sorry. You struck on many of my pet peeves (it's not your training style, if you're wondering). I won't post them here for fear of it being construed as a personal attack. I will try to reign in the nasty; however, I stand by everything I said.
I'm not trying to strike a chord with you, I am simply offering my take on the discussion. This has been my approach to 99% of this thread, and I really feel like others have been far more critical of me personally, than I have them.
Clearly you work with dogs a lot, and have insight and philosophies I do not. I like you sharing them, but I am prone to respond equally negatively when someone is so critical.
 
You're right. At least she provided some form of insight in her posts, I shouldn't have left you out like that. TROLL!!!

I don't **ouch** need to prove **ouch** myself to you. Emily is in **ouch** the process of learning what I **ouch** already know you don't comprehend **ouch** what is written. I'm not going to waste my **ouch** time formulating long winded responses **ouch** to your drivel any longer.

This was all I **ouch** needed to see **ouch** to know what I've been **ouch** dealing with:
so we started doing "leave it" training, and now every time we take one out to hold she lies down reactively.
100_4634_524.jpg


That' quote **ouch** contains a "we" and **ouch** an "every time" and **ouch** a "reactively". None of which **ouch** are evident in that picture!! **ouch** :bowdown:

**ouch**
D80
 
I think I'm gonna go out and... *gasp* actually train the dog! :eek:

What a thought - lol. For all my typing, the dog's not learning a damn thing.
:rofl:
 
Seriously guy's, I find it a little immature and unfactual to be obsessing over this photo. This is a 2 and a half year old German Shephard, who at an early age showed all the signs if being an alpha dog, and now she can be in a room or outdoors and still respect the personal space of another creature. If you can manage to manipulate this photo into one lump thesis on how this disproves positive reinforcement, than I'm frightened at what else your capable of convincing yourselves of. I have no problem with the sharing of different techniques; I encourage it. I think we all know an emoticon of "rolling on the floor laughing" does not mean your laughing, or even smiling for that matter. How can anyone seriously enjoy the angle this threads taking?.

I've been lucky enough to receive excellent advice from a few members on this site, and as such I will just request we end the nonsense and discuss this civilly. I think all of our posts in some way have lead to a negative opinion on how other members judge us, so let's take personally responsibility for our parts and move forward. For the members who truly feel I insulted their expertise; I apologize, and for those who have offended me; apology accepted!.
 
Your narrow mindedness is tragic.

This is what happens. I get out my clicker. I condition a new behavior until it's satisfactory. I begin training under distraction. This goes on for quite a while. I fade out food to a low rate of variable reinforcement. Etc, etc. Now, let's say this happens. Dogs sits 99% of the time. Great. One day, I say "sit" while the dog is sniffing pee - and I've commanded the dog into a sit from sniffing pee before. The dog's ear twitches, she looks up, then goes back to the pee. Collar correction. Praise and reward upon compliance.

This creates a dog with a good work ethic and a positive attitude about its work, but with a healthy respect for the wishes of its handler. And quite to the contrary, the ability to move fluidly between styles without confusing the dog is the mark of great trainer. The fact that you believe you can’t combine styles and methods is just plain… scary. If you actually understand learning theory, you can combine anything because you know exactly what you’re doing. I run far and fast from trainers who think you have to stick with one training “recipe” – even when it’s not working! That tells me they don’t understand dogs; they’re just following a manual.

If you've read my posts, you'd know I don't buy it. I think it's outdated and ridiculous to state that any time a dog does not comply, it is because the dog does not understand my expectations. I think that's MOST of the time, but not all of time. When my dog does not understand, we go back a step. When she blows me off, she's in trouble. A little trouble, not a lot, but a little. I think it’s flat out derogatory to dogs to act as though they can make the decision that they don’t feel like complying. We are essentially using a psychological model that has been long thrown out as debunked in humans on our dogs. Why? There is increasing evidence of their cognitive abilities…

And please, I'm not dumb enough to call the dog to me and punish it. :rolleyes: Seriously. It's become quite clear you don't even understand how a balanced trainer uses a correction in a motivational-based training program. It's honestly humorous you're trying to tell me that how I train "doesn't work" and that I can't "eliminate punishment".

Number 1: Punishment is self-eliminating, that's the operant definition of
punishment. If it doesn't deter the behavior it's not punishment, it's just bad dog training.

Number 2: I've got off leash obedience with the dog sitting at about 95-97% reliability. Heel, sit, down, long stays, recall, down on recall, sit and down out of motion. So please, tell me training doesn't work. Please tell me again. ...Please? (And yes, I can get you a video of you want. Where? Neighborhood park? Pet store?) I want you to see how my dog works consistently and with a big wagging tail.

I'm gonna be real honest here, Michael, and say that this conversation does not particularly interest me. I have discussed with positive only crowd before, and there is nothing you can say that will be new to me or enlighten me. And you're exposing some glaring gaps in your knowledge, which is making this less than fun.

Emily that is very similar, if not just like I train. I would have explained in detail, but these guys do not know how to read and then, comprehend what they have read. I submit exhibit # 17, http://www.cornsnakes.com/forums/showpost.php?p=919878&postcount=240 .
 
Alpha dog...like in hierarchy? Weird!
No ones denying that all dogs don't have different places, initially, in a pack setting. It starts the day they feed from the mother, but what we're saying is that it's 100% possible to change that with positive reinforcement. As for JT, no it wasn't a reference, but if there is movie with him in it I would have you tell me?. I can't get enough of the lovably feminine, glass wearing phenomenon known as Justin Timberlake.
 
So who is up for a "discussion" (a new thread of course) on what dog food is the best, because I know for an absolute fact that mine is. LOL
 
So who is up for a "discussion" (a new thread of course) on what dog food is the best, because I know for an absolute fact that mine is. LOL

Ricky/Michael, do yall have a cousin/friend/uncle/grandpa/trainer/brother/sister/someone you know that is an animal nutritionist? Just curious.
 
Back
Top