• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

What do YOU think they are?

wilomn

No One of Consequence
A friend of mine and I can't quite agree on what these guys are.

So, what do you who know think?
 

Attachments

  • Female Hypo 1.JPG
    Female Hypo 1.JPG
    76.6 KB · Views: 168
  • Female Hypo 2.JPG
    Female Hypo 2.JPG
    78.7 KB · Views: 167
  • Female Sunglow.JPG
    Female Sunglow.JPG
    73.5 KB · Views: 168
  • Male Sunglow.JPG
    Male Sunglow.JPG
    73.2 KB · Views: 168
Normal (maybe hypo), normal, hypo, hypo?? Maybe amels but the eyes look too dark? But do they have white, especially #3?
 
Number 1 has almost no black at all, just a thin outline on the saddles.

Number 2 is much heavier but nowhere near what my normals have.

Number 3 has a few spots of white.

Number 4 has no white at all, just red and orange.

There is no known Creamsicle in there.
 
I just couldn't say if either of the last two were ultra/mel either. I'm not familiar enough with it.

So I'm changing #3 to amel-something.
 
1. hypo
2. maybe normal het hypo?
3. amel
4 ultramel?

No body laugh at my guess I've only been drooling over corns for a year lol!
 
Okay, conservative guess is 1) hypo 2) normal 3) hypo 4) amel (possibly out of a creamsicle line)
Here's a pic (or two) of my ultramels (first pic is an adult ultramel, second is one of her babies, which looks exactly like she did at that age):
 

Attachments

  • corn snake ultramel xsm.jpg
    corn snake ultramel xsm.jpg
    286.6 KB · Views: 58
  • hatchling ultramel corn snake sm.jpg
    hatchling ultramel corn snake sm.jpg
    199.5 KB · Views: 58
A bunch of beautiful, but "who cares?" norms, hypos (of indetrminate type), and amel. I guess I don't understand the point of this exercise. Who is it supposed to belittle?
 
Huh...I gathered that it was in the sense of collective enjoyment of the species, but maybe I was wrong there?

Now, I'm questioning the motives....great!
 
I'm an ultra-cynic, and I've been around the block. But I'm not infallible...

LOL...I hear you there. I was being facetious in that last message.

I actually thought the original post was some sort of joke or exercise, but responded anyway. "Who cares?"...may very well be, but I was bored. I imagine a lot of those who posted were...or just have too much free time! :D
 
Well, a guy goes looking for some facts from those who know and look what happens.

I thought hypo, maybe hypo but sure not an average normal, neat amel, and not sure what amel but possible ultramel or sunglow.
I've been breeding corns for many years but never got into all the different colours or morphs. All of these were produced by me but not of any particular design. Back in the long ago I got corns from the Loves, and BHB and Joe Pierce, heck even Serpenco and a few guys I can't remember who aren't around anymore.

My friend thought hypo, normal, amel, amel.

#4, lacking all white just seemed to be something else to me.

Sometimes a simple query is just a simple query.

Thanks for the help.
 
#1 hypo assuming its not a hybrid, looks just like my Cinnamon.
#2 normal with a little bit of frosting
#3 and #4 look Amel again assuming these arent hybrids
 
Back
Top