Good job he didn't eat or he may have regurged
...or more likely died in the process!
Oh wow. Thanks for the info! I'm not sure if we have multimammate here, but I'll check it out.
Multimammates are called African Soft Furred rats around here. You can get them, but they are MUCH more expensive to buy than mice. The pinks are also LARGER than standard mouse pinks, so they aren't the best food for hatchling corns.
D: Erk, well be careful! Give him a break for at least 3 days before feeding him again.
Actually, wait 7 days. Three days will often force a follow-up regurg, and that can quickly lead to death. Wait a full weel. The suggested 10 days would be OK, but I don't think that long of a wait is necessary. Whatever you do, do not feed it again immediately. The head suggestion for the next meal or two is a great idea - especially for a snake that was prematurely weakened from not eating for a while. HOWEVER, the most important thing to figure out is WHY it puked! Was the temp range off. If you don't have a max-min thermometer on the warm and cool side of the cage - where the snake hangs out! - then you do NOT know the actual temp range within the cage no matter what you think. Was the meal too large for a snake that hadn't eaten in a while? Et cetera et alias.
One thing we DO know: it did not regurg because it "ate too fast."
... also I'm not really sure rats are more nutritious than mice, except that they are "larger" so there is "more nutrition. I mean, they might be, but I don't see why a rat pink would be different from a mouse pink, gram for gram.
Well, this is a case of saying without knowing....lol. Rats are completely different organisms. You seem to be confusing nutrition with overall meal mass. Just because something is LARGER, it doesn't mean it has more nutrition. A head of lice berg lettuce has MUCH less nutrition than a smaller steak......and a fatty chunk of pork ribmeat is less "nutritious" than a piece of wild game steak of the same mass.
Anyway, rats have a MUCH better Ca

ratio than mice (which is a good thing), but they also have a much higher fat content. This may result in faster growth, but it is only because the snake stores more fat. Remember that a snake has too slow of a metabolism to really use fat in its diet. The fat is broken down and stored - not immediately used. (This is true in people and most animals kept on a farm - except chickens.) Feeding more fat to a snake means the snake gets fatter - not necessarily healthier or more mature. Rats are good for quick growth (even if not the "best" growth) and for quickly putting mass back on a female after laying eggs (lots of fat=energy goes into yolk production), but it may not be the best diet long-term. I firmly believe that it is not.
The better Ca

ratio, though, is a BIG bonus when feeding rats. ...especially, once again, for laying females.
KJ