Hello
Why not reverse the thing take a tessere and a Cal king ( without anything )and try to put the the pattern back to the cal king. Its dominant just like my buf, that wil say whe now it after one cross. And than look if this patternmorph goes back to where you think it came from.
It wil always so that the man who think that he has something new, he must prove and prove and prove. I done it with my thing , and than is was still
ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssttt.
Greatings
Jan
Using this formula of breeding, one could
breed tessera X Bull Snake, and if it is 50% F1 dominant, then tessera comes from Bull Snake
Or Tessera X Honduran Milksnake = 50% Visual Tessera, so Tessera comes from Honduran Milksnake.
Or Tessera X Florida Kingsnake = 50% Visual Tessera, so Tessera comes from Florida King.
This is not working for me.
I would rather take Striped California King X Cornsnake with no pattern hets, get 50% Striped CalKorn hybrids,
raise the striped ones up,
breed CalKorn (25% CalKing) X Cornsnake No pattern hets, see if 50% hatch striped, IF SO,
raise the stripes up,
breed those CalKorn stripes (12.5% Cal King) to corn (with no pattern hets, unrelated stock), see if 50% hatch striped
If anywhere along the way the 50% ratio drops off, then Tessera is not derived from Cal King as Joe tells us.
OR-
If one looks at Tessera and Stripe Cal King as both simply being "Dorsal Stripe",,
Dorsal Stripe X Dorsal Stripe = Dorsal Stripe.
Does this prove that Cal Kings are Tesseras?
Does this prove that Tessera is Cal King?
I'd be far more interested in creating Tessera from scratch.
Re: Buf: I don't have a Buf. But that is a color, not a pattern.
Toffee X Buf = Buffee? :sidestep: