John Albrecht
New member
An additional .02 cents
I truly do see everyone's point about the difficulty of identifying and maintaining a supposedly "pure" locality type line. All the arguments that have been put forth are valid.
Even though I desire for myself to have "pure" locality animals I know that a lot of people don't value that. All I can hope for is that animals be identified appropriately regardless. If you are able to nail down the heritage of offspring that are being sold and can reasonably connect the dots back to the original stock then go ahead and say they are locality. I think you can do that regardless of how many generations have gone by as long as there hasn't been outcrossing and you keep good records to know that. If you are not able to completely validate the line then you have a "look alike" morph. There is no shame in that, and I agree that sometimes those animals can even be more attractive. The market clearly doesn't mind, just please provide full disclosure.
In each case for the contributors here I have found that if I asked the right questions I got accurate answers. To some degree it is the buyers responsibility to ask those questions about the pedigree. Until recently I didn't really know of anybody breeding "pure" locality Okeetee's. So I did exactly as has been suggested here, which is, that I went and collected my own stock. I have cornsnakes that are mutts and I have cornsnakes that are "pure" locality.
If someone comes along and wants to obtain pure locality animals from me then that person has some decisions they have to make about me. First, do they trust me when I say I have "pure" locality animals. Secondly, can I validate in any way, shape or form, what I am claiming. To the best of my knowledge the only thing I can do in that regard is to maintain accurate records. I have the details on the animals that are the founding stock. I have the capture location and approximate age of each of the WC founder stock. I can supply that information, then it is up to each buyer to decide if that is "pure" enough for them. If I didn't have that information then my claims to have "pure" stock would be diminished in value.
Some people think that "pure" Okeetee means that they are descended from stock from Okeetee Hunt Club. For others it means they are from Jasper Cnty. To me everyone's opinion is as valid as the next guys, as long as you can substantiate what you claim. Same goes for Miami corns, I've seen gorgeous grey background corns all the way up in Maryland, and if I'm not mistaken Rich, I think you've seen some of the very same animals. If someone wants to claim them as Miami corns then go right ahead. But I think it would be appropriate to disclose as best possible where they actually came from.
I truly do see everyone's point about the difficulty of identifying and maintaining a supposedly "pure" locality type line. All the arguments that have been put forth are valid.
Even though I desire for myself to have "pure" locality animals I know that a lot of people don't value that. All I can hope for is that animals be identified appropriately regardless. If you are able to nail down the heritage of offspring that are being sold and can reasonably connect the dots back to the original stock then go ahead and say they are locality. I think you can do that regardless of how many generations have gone by as long as there hasn't been outcrossing and you keep good records to know that. If you are not able to completely validate the line then you have a "look alike" morph. There is no shame in that, and I agree that sometimes those animals can even be more attractive. The market clearly doesn't mind, just please provide full disclosure.
In each case for the contributors here I have found that if I asked the right questions I got accurate answers. To some degree it is the buyers responsibility to ask those questions about the pedigree. Until recently I didn't really know of anybody breeding "pure" locality Okeetee's. So I did exactly as has been suggested here, which is, that I went and collected my own stock. I have cornsnakes that are mutts and I have cornsnakes that are "pure" locality.
If someone comes along and wants to obtain pure locality animals from me then that person has some decisions they have to make about me. First, do they trust me when I say I have "pure" locality animals. Secondly, can I validate in any way, shape or form, what I am claiming. To the best of my knowledge the only thing I can do in that regard is to maintain accurate records. I have the details on the animals that are the founding stock. I have the capture location and approximate age of each of the WC founder stock. I can supply that information, then it is up to each buyer to decide if that is "pure" enough for them. If I didn't have that information then my claims to have "pure" stock would be diminished in value.
Some people think that "pure" Okeetee means that they are descended from stock from Okeetee Hunt Club. For others it means they are from Jasper Cnty. To me everyone's opinion is as valid as the next guys, as long as you can substantiate what you claim. Same goes for Miami corns, I've seen gorgeous grey background corns all the way up in Maryland, and if I'm not mistaken Rich, I think you've seen some of the very same animals. If someone wants to claim them as Miami corns then go right ahead. But I think it would be appropriate to disclose as best possible where they actually came from.