tyflier
[Insert Witty Commentary]
tbtusk wrote:
I don't buy the "scientific fact" part of your quote above. Naturally speaking, human beings are born with 3 instincts; grabbing, suckling, and startling. From the moment of birth a baby will grab onto whatever touches it's palm, will attempt to suckle anything that touches it's cheek, and will startle to a loud noise. These are the only 3 universal responses in EVERY healthy child born in the world. These are the first 3 things they "test" for upon the birth of a newborn baby. NOT doing one of those 3 activities within minutes of birth is indicative of neurological or developemental issues.
Everything else is a learned response to specific stumuli. A "fear of snakes" is not an instinct, it is a learned response. A fear of heights is not an instinct in itself, but self-preservation IS and instinct, from whence the fear of heights, and most liekly the fear of snakes(through ignorance), is derived. The instinct is self-preservation. The fear is a learned response BASED on that ionstinct, but is not instinctual, itself. If it were, than native people's such as the Anasazi would never have existed. The "instinctual" fear of heights would have prevented them from creating their homes in the sides of 200 foot cliff faces. If a fear of snakes were "instinctual", indiginous people's of the Amazon Jungles would not have survived in harmony with the giant reptile species found there, nor would they have honored them as a deity.
In order for a response to be considered "instinctual", it needs to be universal to all members of the same species. Clearly, a fear of snakes and a fear of heights does NOT fit this criteria, therfor, it cannot be anything BUT a learned response.
...People are born with 2 fears, snakes and heights (that's scientific fact!!). I think all us people who have loved snakes since we were 5 are a little "weird", as in not the way most people are. We just have a special extra something that no one else has. We're NOT afraid....
I don't buy the "scientific fact" part of your quote above. Naturally speaking, human beings are born with 3 instincts; grabbing, suckling, and startling. From the moment of birth a baby will grab onto whatever touches it's palm, will attempt to suckle anything that touches it's cheek, and will startle to a loud noise. These are the only 3 universal responses in EVERY healthy child born in the world. These are the first 3 things they "test" for upon the birth of a newborn baby. NOT doing one of those 3 activities within minutes of birth is indicative of neurological or developemental issues.
Everything else is a learned response to specific stumuli. A "fear of snakes" is not an instinct, it is a learned response. A fear of heights is not an instinct in itself, but self-preservation IS and instinct, from whence the fear of heights, and most liekly the fear of snakes(through ignorance), is derived. The instinct is self-preservation. The fear is a learned response BASED on that ionstinct, but is not instinctual, itself. If it were, than native people's such as the Anasazi would never have existed. The "instinctual" fear of heights would have prevented them from creating their homes in the sides of 200 foot cliff faces. If a fear of snakes were "instinctual", indiginous people's of the Amazon Jungles would not have survived in harmony with the giant reptile species found there, nor would they have honored them as a deity.
In order for a response to be considered "instinctual", it needs to be universal to all members of the same species. Clearly, a fear of snakes and a fear of heights does NOT fit this criteria, therfor, it cannot be anything BUT a learned response.