If it's "just a word", make up your mind. Use it or don't. Don't give me a list of situations where it is appropriate and where it's not. If the R-word is "just a word" it's always appropriate, otherwise it's not. The N-word is another of those words that's wholly inappropriate for anyone to use. Any amount of situational justification on anyone's part is just a lot of . . . words.
I see...someone who believes that context and intent have no place in language. I sure am glad that you don't teach MY kid. I want my daughter to understand that words have multiple meanings, context, emphasis, and intent, all of which are HUGELY impactive to their appropriateness.
Any attempt on anyone's part to remove context and intent from the usage of words in the English language is just showing their complete lack of comprehension OF the English language.
For example...Telling a grown man that is acting like a whining baby to "grow up...or kill yourself..." is contextually sarcastic. Telling someone in the midst of a nervous or emotional breakdown, where suicide is a very real option the same thing is cold-hearted, and inappropriate.
Nice to know that some of the teachers in this country not only lack basic reading comprehension, but they have no concept of contextual language. No wonder our schools are behind every other developed nation in the world...
Almost all of us long for peace and freedom; but very few of us have much enthusiasm for the thoughts, feelings, and actions that make for peace and freedom. ~Aldous Huxley
D80
LOVE your last quote. Too bad you obviously do not comprehend it's meaning.
Part of freedom and peace, at least in the US, is the Right to Free Speech. That right doesn't come and go depending on whether or not some find a word offensive. That right is guaranteed, and whether you, personally, like the use of a word or not is irrelevant to my right to use it. Whether you, personally, believe it is rude, uncouth, childish, or demeaning does not in any way alter my right to use it, freely, in whichever situations I deem appropriate.
Just because I, personally, choose to limit my use of certain words to contextually appropriate situations does not mean that others are required to do so.
Ultimately, it is the words that are MOST offensive that require the most protection. I hate racists and racial supremecists, and everything they stand for. But I will fight til my last breath for their right to believe it and say it. Rest assured I will also be the first in line to stop their actions when they cross the line from speaking to acting on hatred and violence...
I like how the individuals that seem so fast to strip people of their basic individual rights and gfreedoms in this country are the first to say that I hate America. Seems to me that those of you wishing to impose moral laws, regulate religion, and dictate individual morality are the ones that hate the foundation of this country which is, in case you forgot, Individual fFreedom.
Ultimately, Mr. Rham's use of the word "retard" in this situation did not directly or indirectly cause violence, hatred, or aggressive action against any individual or group. So frankly...the rest is just huff and puff. There isn't anything wrong with it legally or morally. Just a mater of personal opinions.
But since I am "debating" with someone that doesn't believe in Freedom of Speech or contextual language, I imagine my post will be dismissed as "incoherent", "lacking structure", and "impossible to understand"...:nope: