• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Something that has happened (not hypothetical)

Who cares? Both worldviews are irrational. They're both symptoms of the same disease, and extremists from both groups have committed significant massacres against other American groups based on brainwashed dogma. (Read up.)

Extremists are extremists. Nothing like an exclusive deity to fire them up. I kinda like Jesus. I'm not convinced that he ever existed, but he's one of my favorite literary figures. Good guy, that one (or One, if you prefer).

Dean-o, you’ve been in the vodka haven’t you.

If we are going to exclude religious groups that have been involved in committing significant massacres we are going to have a hard time coming up with a candidate. Nancy Reagan was pretty mellow with her psychic adviser.

I don’t really care what religion (or lack there of) people subscribe to as long as it doesn’t interfere with logical thinking.
 
I don’t really care what religion (or lack there of) people subscribe to as long as it doesn’t interfere with logical thinking.
Could not agree more!!...I don't like when the word Muslim becomes synonymous with extremist at all, and even so Barack Obama is not a Muslim. If he were I would not care at all, like you said, as long as it didn't interfere with logical thinking..Must rep this post, because it is honestly refreshing to hear!.
 
Didn't bush start this war without congressional permission?

Both wars (Iraq and Afghanistan) were supported by congress. The war in Iraq however was not supported by the United Nations. That is the main reason for Canada's refusal to become part of that "coalition".
Ironically, the war in Iraq was based on bad intelligence. Congress bought into the Bush administrations "weapons of mass destruction" ploy when in reality, Junior Bush was itching to make good on the war his dad didn't finish. The military offensive in Afghanistan took a back seat to the Iraq war unfortunately.

I don't even hate Obama because he is a Muslim. His lying about it to get elected IS part of the reason I despise him

I really think you need to do a little research. Just because his ancestry has Muslim roots doesn't make a person Muslim. It is living ones life according to the Koran and professing the faith that makes one Muslim. But at first glance, that statement exhibits a lack of tolerance for Muslims. You should really put all those degrees to good work KJ and get a job with the government in the propaganda department, because you excell at mistruths. I'm beginning to think you were a huge fan of McCartheyism.
 
KJUN said:
I don't even hate Obama because he is a Muslim.

that statement exhibits a lack of tolerance for Muslims.

Riiiigggghhhhhttttt! It's obvious that I hate Muslims when I state plainly that I don't dislike someone because they are Muslim. I don't think Dean was the only one hitting the vodka there, Como.

Just because his ancestry has Muslim roots doesn't make a person Muslim.

Well, I might agree with you. too bad much of the Muslim world disagrees with both of us. Next you'll tell me he really did sit through a white America HATING church and never hear a bad word spoken? What hurt more when you swallowed that tripe? The hook, line, or the lead sinker?

Even if not Muslim, Obama isn't a good christian - or a good person of any religion or non-religion at all. He's not a good person. THAT'S why I dislike him on a "personal" level. On a political level, he wants to destroy the country and rebuild it as something new. That's a traitor to the constitution to me. That's a traitor. He deserves what any traitor of his level gets.

No, I don't know what that is. Punishment is good enough for me. I am not advocating violence. In fact, I think violence would help his cause. i'd love impeachment, but I'll settle for a loss in the polls for that party later this year...and especially in 2012.

That's enough for me. ;)
 
Sarah Palin comes to Rush's defense when he says " Our politically correct society is acting as if a huge insult has taken place by calling a bunch of people who ARE 'retards,' retards. And now there's going to be a Retard Summit at the White House!"

Sarah says that's "Ok, because Rush was using satire to get his point across. There's a big difference." :rolleyes:

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-co...ry-08-2010/sarah-palin-uses-a-hand-o-prompter

Be sure to watch the end to see the speech on her other hand.
 
Ironically, the war in Iraq was based on bad intelligence. Congress bought into the Bush administrations "weapons of mass destruction" ploy when in reality, Junior Bush was itching to make good on the war his dad didn't finish. The military offensive in Afghanistan took a back seat to the Iraq war unfortunately.

Call me stupid, but, being a man who has spent the last four years working and training with a wide variety of explosives, including WMD's. It is, to my knowledge that Nerve Agents are, in fact, weapons of mass destruction. And, we have found plenty of those in Iraq. They have been there since the Russians, and I don't remember the Intelligence telling the American people that Iraq was creating them, only that they had them. Which, in fact, they did.
 
Great.

That's what we have to look forward to. Retard Limbaugh and Idiot Palin in 2012!!

That's probably Obama's best chance for re-election, actually...

:nyah:
 
30216_78402_Large_rUeJ6HilGB6R.jpg
 
Sarah Palin comes to Rush's defense when he says " Our politically correct society is acting as if a huge insult has taken place by calling a bunch of people who ARE 'retards,' retards. And now there's going to be a Retard Summit at the White House!"

Sarah says that's "Ok, because Rush was using satire to get his point across. There's a big difference." :rolleyes:

Well as long as Sarah says it's OK, then I guess she'd see the satire in this one......

30216_78404_Large_gUfPOdW4r3O.jpg
 
Ricky, don't you think this ad right next to your post is kind of prophetic?
 

Attachments

  • Muslim Bride (Small).JPG
    Muslim Bride (Small).JPG
    50.8 KB · Views: 58
Bush wasn't all that bright (buthe was really FAR from stupid!), but at least he surrounded himself ith intelligent people. Nobama is pretty darn intelligent, but he has surrounded himself with complete idjuts.

If Icould only figre out what that really means............ Right now, I just find the comparison humorous.
 
Thanks for calling the amusing ads to my attention! and I am printing out the first Bush poster for here at work...That will really tick off a bunch of people.
 
Even if not Muslim, Obama isn't a good christian - or a good person of any religion or non-religion at all. He's not a good person.
Who are you, as a "good" Christian, to judge Obama as a person, Christian, or other? You can criticize his policies all you want, or even state that it's your opinion that Obama is not what you consider to be a "Good Christian", but you state it like it's fact, and that's completely wrong. The fact is, you have no idea exactly who Obama is as a person, nor do I, so for you to make those claims is ridiculous.
 
Who are you, as a "good" Christian, to judge Obama as a person

Ummmm, you are confusing ME with your brother, Ricky. He's the one that recently made comments about my soul and its fate. I've never claimed to be a Christian. Matter of fact, I've stated pretty often that I am (somewhat regretfully) just a plain old agnostic. Sorry, good point on that statement (and I hand it to you that it would be a valid one if I were a Christian), but you shot it at the WRONG target this time. ;)

Of course, I am talking about Christian-the-religion and not Christian-the-culture. When I state Obama's evil, I don't mean in a spiritual way. Good dock, but wrong boat. ;)

Watch the irony.....

You can criticize his policies all you want, or even state that it's your opinion that Obama is not what you consider to be a "Good Christian", but you state it like it's fact, and that's completely wrong.

Yopui saying MY statement is completely wrong is a statement from you that could be just as wrong. I'm defining wrong as "incorrect." Hence the irony. If you meant wrong as "inappropriate," that I can't disagree with you if ANYONE actually did interpret my statements as anything but my opinion. If they didn't, then you are correct (assuming this definition of "wrong"). If they did not, then the statement is just irrelevant. Someone, I don't think anyone took my words as an iota more than my opinion.

Of course history supports these policies have been bad before. History will again, I'm positive. Sooooooo, where does that leave us?
 
Bush wasn't all that bright (buthe was really FAR from stupid!), but at least he surrounded himself ith intelligent people. Nobama is pretty darn intelligent, but he has surrounded himself with complete idjuts.

If Icould only figre out what that really means............ Right now, I just find the comparison humorous.

Hmm...The only problem I have with this entire statement is trying to picture Cheney and McCain as "intelligent"... Quick on the uptake...OK, I get that. Good at PR? Yup...both of them. Smart manipulaters? Absolutely. But I just can't grant them both "intelligent"...

I must admit, however, that since Cheney got away with shjooting his buddy in the face, and his BVUDDY actually apologized...well...I don't know if it's intelligence, but...it sure is good.

DISCLAIMER--This entire post is sarcastic, facetious, AND tongue in cheek. It is not meant to insult, offend, argue, incite, anger or instigate. K?:nyah:
 
Back
Top