KJUN
Well-known member
a cherry or cherry syrup?
Both. Pitted cherry. Stem optional, but preferred.
a cherry or cherry syrup?
I probably spelled it wrong, but it's basically a champaigne with little gold flakes in it. It runs for 1,000$ a bottle, and tastes delicious; with chocolate milk of course!!.Done! ( What the heck is Crystal...vodka? sounds like something Laverne from Laverne and Shirley ( old sitcom)would drink lol
![]()
There's nothing wrong with idealism. That's a quality all leaders should possess. Otherwise how can they lead?.
Turned away, no!. Ill advised treatment, absolutely!. It's especially divided among cultural lines. Not sparking a new debate, but it is a factor!.!.
I don't think so. What businesses can and can't afford depends on revenue, and I doubt his legislation would turn all small-business owners bankrupt. On the contrary, I think it's a service they should provide, and I'm sure their will be tax cuts and programs so they can afford it more easily than they could in the past. Not to mention it will lead to a healthier work force, which in turn will increase productivity!.!.
Both. Pitted cherry. Stem optional, but preferred.
If I put apitted cherry in there with a stem can you tie a knot in it with your tongue...:noevil:
Thank you KJ, I'm glad you caught that. And sorry Wade missed it.Wade, you left out, "Eric and KJ agree that they just want to be left the heck alone." Pay better attention next time. Otherwise, perfect synopsis....lol.
Maybe we can get you on Letterman? :laugh:Sometimes I have trouble doing that while the stem is still inside the glass, but I can usually get it.....lol.
I took it with a grain of salt, as a meager means of fortifying the forum alliances once again. I thought it was another humorous display, and perhaps not the poetic brilliance you may have.I read the thread sweetheart. If you had read my post and the thread that would have been painfully obvious.
I took it with a grain of salt, as a meager means of fortifying the forum alliances once again. I thought it was another humorous display, and perhaps not the poetic brilliance you may have.
Your contribution has once again been made, haha, good times, move on. Cutting and pasting chronological responses would never recant the truth, it's already been spoken.
If you're referring to the original post, I never publicly said, or felt offended. Yes the Milking the System comment offended me, shouldn't surprise you!Someone makes a comment, on any topic, doesn’t matter.
Ricky and Michael find it offensive.
As he should defend his constitutional rights, I never questioned KJUN on that.KJ defends his constitutional rights. Asks Ricky and Michael question.
Where did I ignore the question? I thought I answered this many times, and what name one question here directed at me that I have not answered.Ricky and Michael ignore question.
Yes, the art of ganging up, and seeing KJUN and I personally were in discussion, other people should butt out.Robbie asks Ricky and Michael to answer KJ’s question.
Maybe Ricky did, and that is his constitutional right. But I did not, so let's start being respectful and responding to us as separate people.Ricky and Michael defend Obama’s plan.
Okay, that's fine, I hope he does get his lucrative dream job.Robbie wants a job and needs money.
When was race ever brought up, and again the Ricky and Michael thing is getting VERY old. Respond to us separately, otherwise don't expect a kind answer to any of your questions.Ricky and Michael say he doesn’t understand what it means to need money like a black man.
He spoke on gay rights, defending would mean that they were under attack, which was never the case. And more than gay rights, it is equal rights.Eric defends gay rights.
Find my post about this, I am very curious. You are the only one to bring up race here, again it is very contradictory.Ricky and Michael feel his pain as only a white black man could.
No debate, we are certainly different people. No tag team either, I share my opinions, and he shares his. Sometimes we just so happen to agree, but we differ in opinions on many things, that's life.We debate weather Ricky and Michael are really one person. (I think they are an ingeniously designed tag team)
Of course, it isn't a right to be two people, it is actually genetic.Ricky and Michael defend their right to be two people.
Great, I absolutely respect that, and would never want his rights infringed upon.KJ defends his constitutional rights.
Sure!Cornsnake 124 makes grandiose statement.
Forkedtung demands documentation.
What was KJUN's unanswered questions towards me, I was quite upfront the entire thread.Robbie asks Ricky and Michael to answer KJ’s question.
Yes, reminds EVERYONE!Deano reminds us to play nice
Actually it was well received until you posted!Everyone ignores him.
Not yet!Deano locks thread.
Emanuel, however, believes that "communitarianism" should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those "who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia" (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. '96).
This was posted on another board I visit. I only read the first page, and have not checked it for sources or accuracy, so take it at face value.
http://www.defendyourhealthcare.us/
The most scary quote was from an actual doctor, related to one of the Presidential cabinet members, who said,
So those of us who are disabled and won't be able to be "functioning" members of society really should not support some of this, apparently. Y'all would be cut off! :eek1: