• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

URGENT: Senate Panel approves Python ban, S373

Hypancistrus

New member
This comes from the HSUS. The Senate Panel approved S373 today, meaning it will now go to the full senate. It is absolutely imperative that people write to their Senators NOW while we still have a chance to end this. Included in this bill so far are the major large constrictors (anacondas, burms, retics, ARP's) along with all varieties of Boa constrictor.

Here is the HSUS press release on this:
http://www.humanesociety.org/news/p...nstrictor_snake_bill_senate_panel_121009.html

This quote I find particularly enlightening... do we really think now that these a-holes will stop with just the big constrictors?
"As stewards of our country's vast public lands and natural resources, we have to deal with the threats posed by invasive species," Sen. Nelson said, adding that more still needs to be done to better regulate all kinds of foreign plants and animals coming into the United States.
 
Here is the USARK press release on the same subject.

December 10, 2009 Wilmington, NC- Driven by powerful special interests and much media sensation S. 373 aka ‘The Python Ban’ is likely to move forward despite lack of scientific justification. Pushed by Sponsor Senator Bill Nelson and the Humane Society of the United States S. 373 could devastate the trade in high quality captive bred reptiles in the United States.

Today the Senate Committee on the Environment & Public Works (EPW) will hold a business meeting on S. 373. The Committee Chair is Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and the Ranking Member is Senator James Inhofe (R-OK). The committee will hold a mark up session where they will consider S. 373, to amend title 18, United States Code, to add constrictor snakes of the species Python genera to the Injurious Wildlife list of the Lacey Act. The committee is expected to amend the bill to include the 9 snakes listed on a recent controversial report by the US Geological Survey (USGS). All tolled the bill could stop the import, export and interstate transport of as many as 45 species of Boas and Pythons.

The USGS report being used to justify these extreme measures has been called into question by a group of independent scientists in a letter to the EPW Committee on November 24, 2009. The letter characterized the USGS report as “not a bona-fide scientific paper”. The US Department of the Interior (DOI) and the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) stand by the report and have recommended to the committee that all 9 snakes reviewed should be included by amendment to S. 373. The independent scientists, who include professors from University of Florida, Arizona State University, Texas A&M and The National Geographic Society, go further to state, “this document is not suitable as the basis for legislative or regulatory policies, as its content is not based on best science practices”

The United States Association of Reptile Keepers (USARK) made an agreement in principle with Senator Bill Nelson’s office to limit the damage to a 3 billion dollar a year trade in these reptiles, but was informed yesterday that the agreement would not be honored. Senator Nelson has justified his position based on the recommendations made in regards to the USGS report by USFWS and DOI. Andrew Wyatt, president of USARK, commented that “it is a real shame that Senator Nelson has changed his position on this issue”. If the bill passes approximately 4 million boas and pythons already in captivity would be rendered valueless overnight with no provisions for disposition or compensation. Wyatt added, “it could create a situation where millions of people will be in possession of injurious wildlife. It is ludicrous to put so many law abiding citizens in that position and diminish the Lacey Act for the sake of political expediency.”

Passage of S. 373 would result in the loss of thousands of American jobs bankrupting an entire industry. Without strong evidence to support the injurious wildlife listing, USARK calls on the Senate EPW Committee to give an unfavorable rating to S. 373.
 
When will it be heard in the full senate?

Stephanie, I am not certain. I wonder if there is a schedule for these things. Will it be heard after the holidays? Who will represent us?

My senator responded to my email:

Dear Ms. Kuta:

Thank you for sharing your concerns about invasive species and Senator Bill Nelson's bill, S. 373. I have worked hard to reduce the destructive impact of invasive species on the environment while being considerate of personal rights of responsible exotic animal owners and breeders.

I sympathize with your concerns regarding restrictions on python trading. However, the annual volume of live imports into the United States has doubled since 1991 and the current regulation we have to monitor species importation is inadequate. The environmental disruption, the economic harm, and the threats to human and animal health are immeasurable. On the whole, current laws, such as the Lacey Act and the Animal Health Protection Act, provide the United States with a very low level of protection from potentially invasive and injurious species. Many species, such as the Burmese Pythons, Snakeheads, Red Lionfish and Nutria that have become extremely destructive invasive species in various parts of the country were not thought to be destructive when they were first imported. One step towards solving invasive species problems is by stopping further importation of a harmful species. The impacts Burmese pythons are having on national treasures like the Everglades and Big Cypress National Parks and the potential for similar problem situations to arise in other parts of the country when careless pet owners release these animals into the wild, needs to be addressed. We must be more careful with our imports, including captive breeds, to ensure that the destructive impact is kept to a minimum.

On July 8, I co-chaired a hearing between the Environment & Public Works Subcommittees on Oversight and Water and Wildlife entitled, "Threats to Native Wildlife Species." The hearing addressed the threats disease and invasive species pose to the country's native wildlife. Most importantly, we learned that prevention is much easier and cheaper than management. I am open to all views and would be interested to learn about what additional information or contrary evidence that you may have. Please feel free to send this material to my office in Washington.

Senator Nelson introduced S. 373 on February 3, 2009. It would amend the federal criminal code to add the constrictor snake of the species Python genera to the list of injurious species that are prohibited from being shipped or imported into the United States. I can assure you that I will track the issue carefully and keep in mind your views.

Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts about S. 373 and pythons. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future about this, or any other matter of concern to you.

This is my response via email to Senator Cardin.

Senator Cardin,

Thank you for your email response to my inquiry on S373, the Python Ban. I appreciate your candor and realize that you are trying to do the right thing.

That being said, the bill currently being considered is a violation of my property rights as a constituent in the state of Maryland. Furthermore, there has been NO valid evidence shown before the panel that would indicate that any of the constricting snake species listed in S373 would be a threat in Maryland, let alone in more northern climates such as New England or Wisconsin. Why then is the bill being made National? Is it not a states right to determine what its citizens can and cannot do with their property??

Recently, numerous scientists sent a letter to the Senate committee regarding S373 stating that the USGS paper which it is based off of does not count as peer reviewed science and SHOULD NOT be used to promote a bill the would so negatively impact so many Americans and their families. There has been no response or consideration even for the opinions of scientists, and this concerns me.

I am worried that a Senator from the great state of Maryland and a senator from Florida are reacting based on fear of things that might occur, a fear that is being encouraged and expanded upon by powerful special interest groups who would like nothing better than to see the pet trade cease to exist. It concerns me when my elected officials are being used as tools by groups such as this that would push through a measure without any valid science to back it up.

I will continue to fight with all my power to prevent the hobby that I love and cherish, and my ability to educate people about said hobby, from becoming extinct. You will be hearing from me again.

Many thanks.
 
Lauren,
this is frustrating, one thing I find it hard to make phone calls during the day. I have the day off tomorrow and I will give MN Senator Amy Klobuchar a call. I may also give Al a call as well and see if he can do some pushing.
I think the best thing to do is for us to call all of our senators and talk to them. The more the merrier. Keep on trying, be nice and educate them.
The one point i made the last time I called was stated that I use my animals for educational purposes with Children. Many contacts were asking me questions about the work I do. So maybe push that as well.
 
I just finished writing a personal letter to my Senator asking him to oppose this bill. MA is in the process of electing a Senator to replace the late Ted Kennedy, so once that election is done in January I will contact the newly elected Senator.
 
GRRRRRRRRRR.....

"As stewards of our country's vast public lands and natural resources, we have to deal with the threats posed by invasive species," Sen. Nelson said, adding that more still needs to be done to better regulate all kinds of foreign plants and animals coming into the United States. ( read this as step 2, step 3 will be regulating trade in all native reptiles)
 
The HSUS recommends that the general public forgo pet reptiles.

Live Reptile Trade


Iguana


The recent explosion in the popularity of pet reptiles—the number hit 11 million in 2005, an increase of 2 million in two years—is bad news for people, reptiles, and the environment.

Hazardous Pets

People who buy reptiles as pets get more than they bargained for. Virtually all reptiles (even healthy ones) carry Salmonella bacteria. This doesn't cause a problem for the animals, but for humans, it can be deadly. In humans, salmonellosis causes diarrhea, vomiting, and fever, and may develop into invasive illnesses such as meningitis and sepsis. Children and the elderly are especially at risk.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that about 74,000 people each year get salmonellosis from reptiles and amphibians, which means 6% of Salmonella cases in the United States can be linked to these animals.

For the sake of human health, the CDC recommends that reptiles be kept out of households that include children and people with compromised immune systems, and that children and immunocompromised people avoid all contact with reptiles and items the animals have touched. Direct contact with a reptile is not necessary to become sick; Salmonella bacteria can live for days on surfaces.

Because of the health risk, it is illegal to sell small turtles (those with a shell length of less than 4 inches) as pets in the United States. The CDC estimates that this ban prevents an additional 100,000 cases of salmonellosis among children each year.

Reptiles pose a threat beyond disease transmission. Snakes and lizards, often sold as hatchlings, can reach six feet or more—at which point they may pose a physical threat to humans and companion animals. Even small turtles can outgrow their tanks, and their welcome.

A Hazardous Trade

Each reptile sold by a pet store represents depleted wild populations, damaged habitats, and individual suffering. While some pet reptiles are bred in captivity, most are taken from the wild or born of wild-caught parents. Each year nearly 2 million live reptiles are imported into the United States, and about 9 million are exported. This poorly regulated trade can leave behind ruined and toxic wild habitats when brute force or gasoline is used to rouse reptiles from their burrows.

Harsh capture techniques, compounded by poor shipping methods and inadequate care, kill many reptiles before they reach the pet store or dealer. An estimated 90% of wild-caught reptiles die in their first year of captivity because of physical trauma prior to purchase or because their owners cannot meet their complex dietary and habitat needs.
Marketed as low-maintenance pets, reptiles are often taken home by families who become overwhelmed by the level of care required. Some reptiles will be abandoned to the wild, where many of them will die from starvation, exposure, or predation. Those who survive often compete with native wildlife for food and habitat, damaging the balance of the ecosystem. Others will be relinquished to shelters, which are not usually equipped to handle these unique animals and which have few options for placing them.

For public health, conservation, and humane reasons, The HSUS recommends that the general public forgo pet reptiles. Wild animals are best left in the wild where they belong.
http://www.hsus.org/wildlife/issues_facing_wildlife/wildlife_trade/live_reptile_trade/
 
i am sending an email to my senator, but is there a pre-written letter that USARK has come out with that i can use? I am short on time and don't want to write up a big thing...
 
I don't think calling my senator is gonna do any good... considering he's the jackass sponsoring the bill. But I'll call all of the other ones!
 
I demand a march on Washington! We need to grab the positive media's attention!! Why should we suffer nationwide for one stupid state!
 
Is there anything the Canadians can do to help? Man, I really didn't think the BS would get this far; my province just had a brush with a similar situation ("public safety" rather than "protecting native flora & fauna"). We hounded the people in charge, and got a reasonable outcome.
 
I demand a march on Washington! We need to grab the positive media's attention!! Why should we suffer nationwide for one stupid state!

Hey! Don't blame the state! Blame the lying d-bag slimeball "running" it into the ground!

But I agree. We SHOULD march. Every single person with a boa, ball, burm, etc.
 
I have always been pretty ummm lets just say outspoken with both of my senators, ans with my rep, so I am going to call. Actually I think that several of the staffers might already n\know me by name b/c I have heard Oh yes I remember speaking with you before. I am pretty sure that at least one of my calls will fall on deaf ears grrr Senator Nelson. But I think it is important to let your rep's know that you disapprove even if you don't think you can change their minds. Anyways before I call and so that I don't sound stupid I need to know what an ARP is :dunce:. Just so ya'll know an ARP can be something totally scary and I am still against the proposed ban on principle but I do think it would better if I knew exaclty what I was talking about. Thanks and sorry you know for being such a newb. :grin01:
 
Hey! Don't blame the state! Blame the lying d-bag slimeball "running" it into the ground!

But I agree. We SHOULD march. Every single person with a boa, ball, burm, etc.

Sorry Robbie (and the other floridians...where I was actually born) Nothing against the state itself. I am just furious that an entire country should have to suffer because of the fear of a take over in ONE giant swamp. It is rediculous!
 
If you look around the other threads, I know I posted the letter I wrote. You could copy and paste it and tweak it to match what you do. Get your parents to send letters too, if you can convince them. We are planning on asking Tara's mom to send a letter to her Virginia Senators this weekend... I was planning on giving her a basic frame letter to send. Let me see what I can get typed up tomorrow, okay?

Stick with this thread... let's keep it at the top. We have hundreds of members here on a daily basis. If everyone sent even one letter....
 
Continue to vote via Open Congress. I don't know if the damn politicians actually care what we peons think, but right now only 9 people have voted for this bill and 505 have voted against. The link is:

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s373/show

And this is what I saw once I voted!
attachment.php
 
Well here's some good news about the Senator, hope it stays this way:
Senator Bill Nelson
Democrat • Florida • 8th Term • Sworn In 1979
Current Term 2007 - 2012 View AllHide

* 2001 - 2006
* 1989 - 1990
* 1987 - 1988
* 1985 - 1986
* 1983 - 1984
* 1981 - 1982
* 1979 - 1980

* 38 Sponsored Bills (Ranks 17 of 100) 0 Made Into Law (Ranks 16 of 100)
* 111 Co-Sponsored Bills (Ranks 42 of 100) 3 Made Into Law (Ranks 17 of 100)
 
Back
Top