• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Beware: "Deadly" snakes

Clearly not an experienced hobbyist, since no one who is would have a pair of alligators (I bet they were caiman), but what a horrible article. Quotes from the HSUS, and comparisons to the tigers the nut in Ohio had?
 
Comments are all in our favor, but I'm embarrassed by the spelling and grammar of some of those defending herps!!
 
Just another Example Of "Big Brother" hard at work!

Nothing In that article made sense!

To my Knowledge, a Ball python or Bearded dragon has NEVER Been responsible for the death of a Human...infant or otherwise. To label them as "Deadly" is insanely ignorant!

Problem is...This is just the beginning......
 
I didn't quite get why the police felt the need to remove the snakes at all? At first they made it sound like it was a violation of the housing laws but when they quoted the actual laws, I didn't see anything in the wording to explicitly preclude snakes. Totally worthless article all around.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top