• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Aaron, The "Pot smoking, sinner."

Oh my god, you're all going to hate me so much for this but that's a great idea! XD Well, aside from the artificial insemination part. BUT! I think it would be great if, temporarily to help bring down the population without killing people, we would make people get licenses to procreate. I guess not "sex licenses" since sex would be fine so long as no one got pregnant, but reproduction licenses. And you'd have to have a certain amount of money, pass a psychological evaluation, and have a certain IQ! *ducks head and prepares for more hate*



Sounds to me like you are living in the wrong Country.... you want to live in China or North Korea or Iran maybe.... you know, a Country where the government is there to monitor and control your life every step of the way.

Denounce your citizenship and surrender your passport ASAP so you can get to a Country where the government knows best and will protect you from yourself. I've got some luggage I could donate if you need it.....


Seriously.... you have no idea what you are talking about and it's progressing to the point where you are supporting REVOKING freedoms that MANY hundreds of thousands of good people have given their life to secure and defend. At this point it is no longer funny or cute or even amusing. Simply put, if you don't like America and our FREE way of life.... then don't let the door hit you on the way out!
 
I wasn't even gonna post in this thread anymore, it's wearing me out. I just noticed the line, "prepares for more hate." Just wow! For 30+ pages, everyone (including myself) was civil and tried to explain things like, "pursuit of happiness." We're a community of snake-keepers, pardon us for appreciating freedom of unpopular pursuits. Now you're talking about taking away people's very reproductive freedom? Might oughta expect that one to go over like a doodie in a punch bowl.
 
People being required to have a certain IQ and pass a "psychological evaluation" to reproduce? This is starting to sound a little bit too much like eugenics for me.

I'm certainly glad that my clinically depressed mother did not need a psychological evaluation in order to procreate. Because, were that the case, I would not be posting right now.
 
LOL!
You know Aaron, I think people like Vicky are the reason that reading the Constitution should be mandatory in schools. Forget gym, cooking, woodworking and metal class. Too many people have no idea about the principles this nation was founded upon.
I think reading comprehension of the Constitution and Bill of Rights should be mandatory anyway. It would be very nice to have known what my rights were by the time I became an adult, and having sections of class dedicated to those would have helped out a lot. After a while it would become common knowledge and maybe people would stop trying to take away our rights.

Outcast and starsevol... I love you two :D
We are running out of people like you :(
While catching up on this post, made me think of how some people just don't think things through, Let's take a look at the people who voted for Obama... Did "Hope and Change" really help? How about throwing a BUNCH of stimulus money out there?
I wish i was old enough to vote back in 08 with the presidential election, I can't believe people actually fell for that shenanigans and actually voted for him, I feel bad for those of you..

I'm gonna get in trouble in this thread... i better get back out of it :sidestep:
 
I personally have nothing against making all the "Vicky laws" that she wants, as long as they only apply to her! That way she can feel safe from herself. ;)
Oh my god, you're all going to hate me so much for this but that's a great idea! XD Well, aside from the artificial insemination part. BUT! I think it would be great if, temporarily to help bring down the population without killing people, we would make people get licenses to procreate. I guess not "sex licenses" since sex would be fine so long as no one got pregnant, but reproduction licenses. And you'd have to have a certain amount of money, pass a psychological evaluation, and have a certain IQ! *ducks head and prepares for more hate*
I also don't have an issue with Vicky not being allowed to reproduce under "Vicky laws" that only apply to her.



I am of course only kidding. I would stand up for everyones rights and freedoms. If some choose not to exercise those rights or freedoms that is their choice. They should however not be taken away by the political gestapo. The same political cretins that have shown time and again their inability to make sound judgments in their own lives. Do we really want those that can't balance their own check book controlling more and more of the nations financial future? Should we trust those that are the epitome of corruption and malfeasance to create the laws that control our lives? Have we really reached the point of becoming a nation of sheeple that blindly follows a system that most openly admit has become a choice of the lessor of two evils? Our laws should be simplistic with little or no room for interpretation. Political loopholes I believe have put us in the position we are in today. Whether it is printing and spending with no accountability, abusing the commerce clause beyond any boundary, ignoring portions of the constitution intended to control the reach of the gov, etc. The list is endless. I for one still very much believe in the land of the FREE and the home of the brave. I really can't fathom how some would rather be led to pasture, branded, corralled, fed, inoculated, and eventually slaughtered at the whim of the caitiffs in DC. :shrugs:
 
Well Tsst, If I do not have to make my own decisions, how can I ever be accountable for my own actions? It sounds great to be a sheeple, but you know what, I would much rather be a Sheep dog, or even better, wild. I cannot stand the government destroying my livelihood just because they think it is not safe for me or others. That is exactly what they are doing with the whole python ban, and that is what they will do when they start trying to ban smoking, drinking, guns, motor cycles, procreation.

I do not see how the government can save me any more than I can save myself, and if they try, there will be resistance.
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40190465/ns/politics-more_politics/

Perfect example of what I was ranting about above.

Mr Rangel of NY said:
"any failings in my conduct were the result of 'good faith mistakes' and were caused by 'sloppy and careless recordkeeping,' but were not criminal or corrupt."
Really, 'good faith mistakes'?
Mr Rangel of NY said:
"I can only hope that the full committee will treat me more fairly, and take into account my entire 40 years of service to the Congress before making any decisions on sanctions.
Really, 40 years and still making 'good faith mistakes'? Maybe just maybe after 40 years he has slipped enough to get caught! I have a tough time believing that someone in that position for 40 years didn't fully know what he could do and not do. And if he actually did not know then he is just simply too stupid to be in a leadership position in this country. :shrugs:
 
Well you know, both Vicky and I are from the Rhode Island. Democratically controlled for something like 70 years or more. Our election results prove us to be one of the stupidest states in the nation.....truly.....the politicians that all had a hand in making this state one of the highest taxed, highest regulated and most business unfriendly in the entire country were either reelected or promoted to higher offices.
 
Well you know, both Vicky and I are from the Rhode Island. Democratically controlled for something like 70 years or more. Our election results prove us to be one of the stupidest states in the nation.....truly.....the politicians that all had a hand in making this state one of the highest taxed, highest regulated and most business unfriendly in the entire country were either reelected or promoted to higher offices.
I feel for you Bethany. The far left mantra is 'we want full blown socialism but we don't want to refer to it as socialism because the negative connotation may harm our chance of reelection'. Look at the bright side. It could be worse you could live in Nancy Pelosi's district! :grin01:
 
I feel for you Bethany. The far left mantra is 'we want full blown socialism but we don't want to refer to it as socialism because the negative connotation may harm our chance of reelection'. Look at the bright side. It could be worse you could live in Nancy Pelosi's district! :grin01:

That woman should have been removed from office, years ago. I don't know why, but every time I see her, I want to punch a puppy. (figuratively speaking of course, I love puppies and would never knowingly hurt one.)
 
I will tell you right now, my husband and I only have 3 ties to this state that we have both grown up in.....and all 3 of those ties are in their mid 70s.

We have lived here all our lives, but we won't be retiring here.....
 
Check out this crazy city commissioner in Gainesville:

Following the swearing-in ceremonies Tuesday for Baird and three-term incumbent Lee Pinkoson, Paula DeLaney launched into extended comments on the current political climate. She stated that the more affluent members of society should pay more in taxes than those less well off, who might face a greater financial burden from a lower tax bill. She also criticized candidates, voters and elected officials who believe it is possible to “starve government into greatness” and who oppose government programs for “taking my money to give to some less-worthy person.”
 
Check out this crazy city commissioner in Gainesville:

Following the swearing-in ceremonies Tuesday for Baird and three-term incumbent Lee Pinkoson, Paula DeLaney launched into extended comments on the current political climate. She stated that the more affluent members of society should pay more in taxes than those less well off, who might face a greater financial burden from a lower tax bill. She also criticized candidates, voters and elected officials who believe it is possible to “starve government into greatness” and who oppose government programs for “taking my money to give to some less-worthy person.”
Would that be Gainesville, USSR?
 
Check out this crazy city commissioner in Gainesville:

Following the swearing-in ceremonies Tuesday for Baird and three-term incumbent Lee Pinkoson, Paula DeLaney launched into extended comments on the current political climate. She stated that the more affluent members of society should pay more in taxes than those less well off, who might face a greater financial burden from a lower tax bill. She also criticized candidates, voters and elected officials who believe it is possible to “starve government into greatness” and who oppose government programs for “taking my money to give to some less-worthy person.”

I wonder if her parents ever taught her anything... Geeze, some peoples kids.
 
Maybe we could all get a big tax break if we closed all the loopholes that allow "corporate welfare" to the mega-corporations.
"Last week, Forbes magazine published what the top U.S. corporations paid in taxes last year. “Most egregious,” Forbes notes, is General Electric, which “generated $10.3 billion in pretax income, but ended up owing nothing to Uncle Sam. In fact, it recorded a tax benefit of $1.1 billion.” Big Oil giant Exxon Mobil, which last year reported a record $45.2 billion profit, paid the most taxes of any corporation, but none of it went to the IRS:

Exxon tries to limit the tax pain with the help of 20 wholly owned subsidiaries domiciled in the Bahamas, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands that (legally) shelter the cash flow from operations in the likes of Angola, Azerbaijan and Abu Dhabi. No wonder that of $15 billion in income taxes last year, Exxon paid none of it to Uncle Sam, and has tens of billions in earnings permanently reinvested overseas."

:eek:
 
Back
Top