• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

High End Herps = Busted

How do you suppose one gains the experience necessary to do anything properly?

You can read only so much. You can talk to others only so much. Sooner or later, if you really want to know what you're doing, you have to put yourself out there and gain first hand knowledge. You may well make mistakes. It's the only way to really get better at anything though.

Maybe she doesn't know now. I haven't read her thread. But that does not mean she is incapable of learning.

As I said, an opinion is a fine thing. But condemning someone for not doing as you, not you in particular just the general all-encompassing you, see fit and approve of, is not cool.
 
Sorry Jadie, but...
While your post is sensible and nice and fair....I just can't abide by it.
I HATE HATE HATE co habbers. I personally rank co habbers and live feeders (when the animal will eat f/k or f/t) right up there with pedophiles and child abusers. I know some may be offended by this, but it's how I see this issue.

I don't consider myself an animal rights nut, but when you have an animal it is up to you to do what's right for the animal, no matter what.

And this particular person in another thread said she had yet ANOTHER problem (after a whole thread about a regurge), and AGAIN people stated that it was likely due to co habbing, and she dismissed it and said that she has already heard "all the co habbing bitchiness"......

She went on the say that she tried to seperate them, but it "broke her heart" and made her feel cruel when they freaked out (as some snakes will do when put in a container with a different smell), and that they "looked for each other"....

Paleeze....

Maybe she IS still here, but apparently she is not learning anything.

Then you better talk to the NC Zoo, who houses various rattlesnakes together, and the Nc Aquarium at Morehead City, who houses various snakes together, I can remember the corns being with the copperheads. Honestly, people who think like you do just make me mad.
 
Ever done any field herping? Ever find more than one snake or more than one species under the same cover? I have. I know others that have. Just that little fact all by itself blows this "they must be kept alone or they'll die" crap right out of any sort of intelligent conversation.

You don't think they are just competing for that good hiding spot, and that they only tolerate each other because their lives depend on it? I don't have a horse in this race. I don't care how others keep their snakes. I'm just curious as to how the above statement proves anything...
 
I think competition is something we as humans add into the snake equation.

I don't think they care. If they did, they wouldn't hang out together. If some do care, they move. The simple fact that they are many times found together suggests that it is not a problem.
 
I'm not arguing. He asked good legitimate questions and gave the best answers I had. Perhaps if you have nothing to contribute you should not contribute at all.
 
I'm not arguing. He asked good legitimate questions and gave the best answers I had. Perhaps if you have nothing to contribute you should not contribute at all.
you are arguing(definition:to present reasons for or against, to persuade, drive, etc., by reasoning, to show; prove; imply; indicate)
 
Wilomn, I think that you are misunderstanding the use of the word "competition" in the case of snake behaviour. It does not mean anything to do with attitude or wanting to be the best or anything. What it means is that one snake habitat can only support the needs of one snake. If you introduce a second snake, they will *at best* each only get half of their needs met. Frequently, one will dominate the other in order to get more of its needs met and survive. In that case, the other may not get the access to belly heat that it needs and it may regurgitate. It may be threatened by the other snake and not go for water as often as it should, causing dehydration and the resulting health problems. In other cases, the two snakes will attempt to bully each other until one eats the other or they kill each other. In no case will both be getting what they need. It's like trying to raise two dogs by only giving them enough food for one and just letting them fight it out. You get two underfed dogs, one starved dog, or vicious dog fights. You do not get two healthy dogs.
 
Wilomn, I think that you are misunderstanding the use of the word "competition" in the case of snake behaviour. It does not mean anything to do with attitude or wanting to be the best or anything. What it means is that one snake habitat can only support the needs of one snake. If you introduce a second snake, they will *at best* each only get half of their needs met. Frequently, one will dominate the other in order to get more of its needs met and survive. In that case, the other may not get the access to belly heat that it needs and it may regurgitate. It may be threatened by the other snake and not go for water as often as it should, causing dehydration and the resulting health problems. In other cases, the two snakes will attempt to bully each other until one eats the other or they kill each other. In no case will both be getting what they need. It's like trying to raise two dogs by only giving them enough food for one and just letting them fight it out. You get two underfed dogs, one starved dog, or vicious dog fights. You do not get two healthy dogs.

it is not like giving 2 dogs enough food for only one at all it is more like giving 2 dogs enough food for both. and how would you or anyone else know what a snakes think about being in a cage with another snake we can't very well ask them so you will never know what they think maybe some like being cohabbed since you are comparing dogs i might as well too some dogs get along and like other dogs and some don't so how do you know it isn't the same with snakes. (I know I was the one who said about arguing but who cares)
 
Toad, I obviously didn't communicate that in an effective manner. Sorry for the confusion but the dog thing was just an attempt at an alternate way of thinking of "needs". I wasn't trying to comment on how my snake or any snake thinks, but what they physically need in order to prevent illness and injury.

I don't think I can explain it any better than the two ways I explained it above, and I don't feel the need to argue.
 
Toad, I obviously didn't communicate that in an effective manner. Sorry for the confusion but the dog thing was just an attempt at an alternate way of thinking of "needs". I wasn't trying to comment on how my snake or any snake thinks, but what they physically need in order to prevent illness and injury.

I don't think I can explain it any better than the two ways I explained it above, and I don't feel the need to argue.

i don't think food would be the best way to explain it cause both snakes would be getting the proper food
 
Wilomn, I think that you are misunderstanding the use of the word "competition" in the case of snake behaviour. It does not mean anything to do with attitude or wanting to be the best or anything. What it means is that one snake habitat can only support the needs of one snake. If you introduce a second snake, they will *at best* each only get half of their needs met. Frequently, one will dominate the other in order to get more of its needs met and survive. In that case, the other may not get the access to belly heat that it needs and it may regurgitate. It may be threatened by the other snake and not go for water as often as it should, causing dehydration and the resulting health problems. In other cases, the two snakes will attempt to bully each other until one eats the other or they kill each other. In no case will both be getting what they need. It's like trying to raise two dogs by only giving them enough food for one and just letting them fight it out. You get two underfed dogs, one starved dog, or vicious dog fights. You do not get two healthy dogs.

Ok, let's try this again.

In regards to snakes, do you, personally, have any experience with this? What, exactly, are you basing your assumptions on?
 
I think competition is something we as humans add into the snake equation.

I don't think they care. If they did, they wouldn't hang out together. If some do care, they move. The simple fact that they are many times found together suggests that it is not a problem.

This conclusion is marred simply because in the wild, out of -choice- snakes do -not- share the same dens(excluding mating). Within a limited space, where there aren't any other options, it wouldn't surprise me that they would all seek out the "best spot".
They are solitary animals, and have been classified as much by dozens if not hundreds of scientists who over the years studied them in the wild.

I don't know if snakes care to be together or not- fact is I know they try to avoid one another in the wild, and as predators it makes allot of sense- competition over territory and resources. Snakes have no understanding that they will always be "fed"- they don't realize there's no need to hunt(they constrict F/T mice).
In the wild they are solitary, I see absolutely no reason to change that just because it's convenient or pretty.

In regards to the challenge to show this happening- I hope no one will conduct such a test- because it would basically mean dropping food and let the snakes battle it out- I promise you, the bigger snake will drive the weaker to eventual starvation- it happens in the wild all the time with animals that -are- social- be it birds, fish and so on.

You want to really test whether snakes mind being co-habbed or not out? study hundreds of cases from different breeders and see the longevity and behavior/health of animals that were housed separately and of animals that were in solitary tanks- and let statistics show the answer.
Until such time as such a study will be conducted, you simply can't conclude that snakes like co-habbing because they don't seem to mind... I am not sure what you want them to do to show they are not happy? write it on a big sign? make a glum face?
What about a dog that misses a limb? he doesn't seem to mind... does it mean he -loves- this condition?

I admit that I haven't the -slightest- idea whether snakes mind or not mind being housed together. I do however think there are major flaws in the logic of all the pro-cohabbing I saw thus far and due to the fact that these are not really "domesticated" animals, I think that conditions that are unnatural should not be needlessly forced upon them.
I keep snakes in a high regard, that based on personal experience and the fact that not all snakes are alike- there's definitely an individual personality in each, even if it's not as deep as a human's- as such, I do not accept the notion that they are feeding, pooping machines that don't care how they are housed.
Snakes have preferences- don't you have snakes that have a special spot they like to poop at? or to coil around in?

I have yet to see anyone cohabbing out of the belief that the snakes are happier that way- I -have- seen many cohab because it's cheaper... and I simply can't abide by that. We have an obligation towards these animals- if you are of the belief that it raises the snake's quality of life... I will disagree but accept what motivates you. If, like most, you co-hab because it's cheap or prettier... well, I think you need to get your priorities straight.
 
I think competition is something we as humans add into the snake equation.

I don't think they care. If they did, they wouldn't hang out together. If some do care, they move. The simple fact that they are many times found together suggests that it is not a problem.

I feel the same way. If you had two, same gendered snakes, why not co-hab them? If they were the same size so that the odds of cannibalism were greatly diminished then I see no problem.

HOWEVER, you cannot guarantee that one of the "same sized" snakes isn't going to pull a crazy and eat the other one anyway, at which point, they'd both die. The actual odds of this are pretty slim, however I've seen it happen and the pictures are NOT pretty.

Another issue is, what if one is sick? You can't tell which one because they don't say "Mommy, ow!", and then you run the risk of the healthy one catching whatever the sick one has.

Sure, co-habbing happens all the time and a lot of the time it's successful, but it's just not my style. The risks far heavily out-weight the benefits for me. Sure you can say "it only happens about 10% of the time!", but when it happens to you then it's 100% for YOU isn't it.

you are arguing(definition:to present reasons for or against, to persuade, drive, etc., by reasoning, to show; prove; imply; indicate)

I think this is more of a discussion than an argument. That is what message boards are for: Discussion.
 
Then you better talk to the NC Zoo, who houses various rattlesnakes together, and the Nc Aquarium at Morehead City, who houses various snakes together, I can remember the corns being with the copperheads. Honestly, people who think like you do just make me mad.

Zoos aren't always in it for the benefit of the animal either. Sometimes creating a pretty display that the public wants to pay to see is worth more than the animals welfare. And I really don't care if i make you mad or not. I consider forcing solitary animals to share a space to be cruel. And cruelty is something I WILL condemn.

And Wes, I will condemn whomever I choose thankyouverymuch, I don't care if YOU think it's "out of line" or what. As I just stated above, I consider it cruelty.

And Oren is right. Co habbers do it to save money, or time, or to "make a pretty display". That has absolutely nothing to do with caring properly for the animal.

Plus. this poster we are talking about, who "has an affinity for animals", won't take advice, and acts like she knows it all, has posted about 2 seperate and distinct problems so far with the co habbed snakes. Well duh, if she knew it all, there would not be any problems now, would there?
 
Also, the zoos mentioned may or may not be good zoos that place animal wellbeing at the top of the list. Many aren't. And the example of the zoo that cohabbed rattlesnakes -- they are a different species, and IIRC often found together in hides in the winter in the wild, so maybe they are more tolerant of it than some species. I don't know, but I am sure there are people who do know on this board.

Anyway, the issue isn't "what do zoos do?" the issue is "what is safest? and how much safety do I NEED for MY snakes?". My personal decision was made months ago -- no cohabbing except stays together in a breeding tub, and those will be of a length guided by experienced breeders. I don't yet know if they should live together for a few days, or have conjugal visits of a few hours.
 
With "certain" established members of my collection (the VERY calmest and most mellow-tempered), during breeding season I do allow "sleepovers".
 
I figured somebody would know the answer. I probably won't need it this year, but I knew I could get it here! :)
 
Back
Top