Sweetseraph
New member
Cohabbing if you know what you're doing is no problem at all.
I don't know enough to agree or disagree with you about cohabbing, but JemmaUK doesn't know what she's doing.
Cohabbing if you know what you're doing is no problem at all.
Sorry Jadie, but...
While your post is sensible and nice and fair....I just can't abide by it.
I HATE HATE HATE co habbers. I personally rank co habbers and live feeders (when the animal will eat f/k or f/t) right up there with pedophiles and child abusers. I know some may be offended by this, but it's how I see this issue.
I don't consider myself an animal rights nut, but when you have an animal it is up to you to do what's right for the animal, no matter what.
And this particular person in another thread said she had yet ANOTHER problem (after a whole thread about a regurge), and AGAIN people stated that it was likely due to co habbing, and she dismissed it and said that she has already heard "all the co habbing bitchiness"......
She went on the say that she tried to seperate them, but it "broke her heart" and made her feel cruel when they freaked out (as some snakes will do when put in a container with a different smell), and that they "looked for each other"....
Paleeze....
Maybe she IS still here, but apparently she is not learning anything.
Ever done any field herping? Ever find more than one snake or more than one species under the same cover? I have. I know others that have. Just that little fact all by itself blows this "they must be kept alone or they'll die" crap right out of any sort of intelligent conversation.
you are arguing(definition:to present reasons for or against, to persuade, drive, etc., by reasoning, to show; prove; imply; indicate)I'm not arguing. He asked good legitimate questions and gave the best answers I had. Perhaps if you have nothing to contribute you should not contribute at all.
Wilomn, I think that you are misunderstanding the use of the word "competition" in the case of snake behaviour. It does not mean anything to do with attitude or wanting to be the best or anything. What it means is that one snake habitat can only support the needs of one snake. If you introduce a second snake, they will *at best* each only get half of their needs met. Frequently, one will dominate the other in order to get more of its needs met and survive. In that case, the other may not get the access to belly heat that it needs and it may regurgitate. It may be threatened by the other snake and not go for water as often as it should, causing dehydration and the resulting health problems. In other cases, the two snakes will attempt to bully each other until one eats the other or they kill each other. In no case will both be getting what they need. It's like trying to raise two dogs by only giving them enough food for one and just letting them fight it out. You get two underfed dogs, one starved dog, or vicious dog fights. You do not get two healthy dogs.
Toad, I obviously didn't communicate that in an effective manner. Sorry for the confusion but the dog thing was just an attempt at an alternate way of thinking of "needs". I wasn't trying to comment on how my snake or any snake thinks, but what they physically need in order to prevent illness and injury.
I don't think I can explain it any better than the two ways I explained it above, and I don't feel the need to argue.
Wilomn, I think that you are misunderstanding the use of the word "competition" in the case of snake behaviour. It does not mean anything to do with attitude or wanting to be the best or anything. What it means is that one snake habitat can only support the needs of one snake. If you introduce a second snake, they will *at best* each only get half of their needs met. Frequently, one will dominate the other in order to get more of its needs met and survive. In that case, the other may not get the access to belly heat that it needs and it may regurgitate. It may be threatened by the other snake and not go for water as often as it should, causing dehydration and the resulting health problems. In other cases, the two snakes will attempt to bully each other until one eats the other or they kill each other. In no case will both be getting what they need. It's like trying to raise two dogs by only giving them enough food for one and just letting them fight it out. You get two underfed dogs, one starved dog, or vicious dog fights. You do not get two healthy dogs.
I think competition is something we as humans add into the snake equation.
I don't think they care. If they did, they wouldn't hang out together. If some do care, they move. The simple fact that they are many times found together suggests that it is not a problem.
I think competition is something we as humans add into the snake equation.
I don't think they care. If they did, they wouldn't hang out together. If some do care, they move. The simple fact that they are many times found together suggests that it is not a problem.
you are arguing(definition:to present reasons for or against, to persuade, drive, etc., by reasoning, to show; prove; imply; indicate)
Then you better talk to the NC Zoo, who houses various rattlesnakes together, and the Nc Aquarium at Morehead City, who houses various snakes together, I can remember the corns being with the copperheads. Honestly, people who think like you do just make me mad.