Why would it require no checking of IDs? That sounds rather silly. When I go into a Kaiser facility, they want to see my health insurance card. Why wouldn't they issue a card to people?
I don't know WHY they wrote it in, but it is generally believed by people against it that they are doing it to "buy" votes. Mexicans that make it to the US (legally or not) that manage to get in the voting booth (legally or not....lol) tend to vote for democrats. That trend is really not debated. The anti-liberals tend to think the liberals want to give the Mexicans more and more to KEEP their votes. In other words, they are buying votes with tax dollars - whether that is true or not is debatable, but I personally am one that believes it completely.
I haven't seen the liberals say WHY they claim to want to do this much (maybe they have - I haven't seen it). Instead, they just tend to ignore the problem or say, "we aren't doing that" while proposing more and more laws that do exactly what they say they aren't doing.
So, WHY? I don't know for sure. Believe what you want. If you check IDs, illegal immigrants couldn't go because they can't get an ID. If you don't check IDs, then illegals could go. Speaking of which, TODAY illegals are already getting treated at taxpayer expense when they can't afford it themselves. It is already happening. I feel sorry for the hurt individual, but I also don't think it is right that I'm paying for a citizen of another country to get treated. (For those that don't know, they go to the ER for bad sniffles - not just real emergencies - because they have to get treated there. This isn't true at a regular doctor's office.)
Are you unable to actually read original documents and learn something
for yourself. Instead, you'd rather spew out nonsense based on ignorance and believe it is the truth because, well, as long as you don't do the research to LEARN more what you want to be true can still be justified in your own mind. (Since you seem unable to find anything on your own, links have been provided previously - read the document and THEN tell us what isn't in there. I can't tell you what is
not in there because I haven't read every word, but what I did read is certainly
in there.)
Maybe it isn't a LIE when a statement is based on intentional continued ignorance, but that makes it worse than a lie in my opinion. I am not talking about my country's rude friend from SC, either.
First...no hospital in this country is ever going to implement a policy where people will be treated without verifying their identity. I
Haahaahaahaahaahaahaahaahaahaahaa... ...and no bank will EVER give a house loan to people with low paying jobs and poor income because they are told to, either. No hospital will treat poor people without insurance knowing they won't receive payment from them because they are told they have to, either. Do you really ignore that those things happen/happened? I live in the US - where do you live? Next you'll tell me the Democrats are doing everything possible to
stop illegals from getting into the voting booths, too.
I notice you live in kalifornia. After seeing how broke your state is from trying socialism, you should fear it more on the country level than on your state level. All those formerly productive people leaving the state now that it isn't successful like it was - where will they go when all the states are the same? Plus, if we are all broke, who will bail out the entire country? There won't be a rich federal government to bail us out if ALL of us are broke. At some point, that run-away printing press will HAVE to stop sending out money...because the paper will be more valuable than the currency printed on it!
When I hear statements from some liberal-communists on the news, on-line, and in person, all I can ever think is, "Are they so stupid that they actually believe those those facts and really do forget about what happened as little as a couple of years ago or are they just so stupid that they believe WE are stupid enough to believe them?" I really don't know the answer to that, but I'd like to know if my intelligence is being insulted or not.
In reference to the rude comment, I agree it was improper (even if true). I agree it shouldn't have been done. (As I also stated before, I'd vote for that guy TODAY given the chance even though he should NOT have done it.) It was wrong this time, and it was wrong every time it was done before. HOWEVER, the main-stream media gives a lot more coverage to Obama's sales pitches than to the Republicans trying to thwart this current piece of legislation. Maybe...just maybe... he felt this was the only way he could get SOME opposing sentiment out on mainstream media into the same type of audience's home. Just saying..... Plus, it's the first time in, what?, seven speeches by
Obama that anything new has been said at all....lol.
