> I do not believe that discrimination should be institutionalised (gay rights), because I believe that I have a right to have someone keep their bible out of my uterus (provisionally for abortion).
May be more of a libertarian than a liberal.
> Please enlighten me as to where I am a *thief* because that is one HELL of a ballsy statement to make
If you reach in my wallet and take money, you would be a thief, right? Even if you gave that money to someone else, you would still be a thief. I'm sure you see that. Now, if you tell your brother to take the money from my wallet, then both of you are thieves, right? Most people would say, yes." Both members that plan the robber/burglary/whatever would be theifs since they are taking the money from the rightful owner against his will.
If the government takes from a person against their will - and another person VOTES for that government to do such - then they are taking money from the rightful owners against their will. Now, some things are allowed by the constitutions, but that doesn't include redistribution of wealth. When it comes to that, it is NOT supported in the constitution, it is pretty much disallowed by it, and it was definitely against the intent based on the words of our forefathers. So, forcing redistribution of wealth to TAKE it from those that earn it and GIVE it to those that do not is tantamount to thievery.
Crap. Garbage. And just flat wrong. This country is FOUNDED on the principle of majority rule. If I vote to increase YOUR taxes it does NOT make me a theif...it makes me a participating member in an actively democratic government. This isn't about "re-distribution of wealth"...it's about healthcare reform(now...it started out accusing opbama of indoctrinating our kids, but you failed miserably with those arguments. So lets change the subject to one you *might* be able to debate better...)
BTW...in case you forgot...the Constitution was designed to allow for changes. Nobody said you had to like them for them to be elgitimate, legal, and good for the betterment of the country. It might SUCK for you personally, but...tough luck. Don't like it? Travel is a right of every citizen of this country. Move to one where they don't allow people to vote for change, make changes, and grow as a nation. I'm sure you'd be happier there...
Telling a politician to take more and more from other people to give to yourself (I don't mean you personally - this is all an analogy) OR third party is the same as stealing it from the earner. This doesn't mean national defense, trade regulation, etc. - I'm talking about pure redistribution of wealth from the "lucky" that MADE their own luck through hard work to the "less fortunate" that are, too often, just not ones that feel like they need to work to "earn" money.
No it isn't. It's voting on how taxes should be spent. If I vote to have taxes more evenly distributed, that does NOT make me a theif...it makes me smart enough to realize that a person making 10times as much as I do and paying the same $$ amount in taxes is about the stupidest way to run a country.
> pay my health insurance though i can scarce afford shelling out $300 a month for something I rarely use when my hours have been cut by half.
Right. I understand. Some liberals (more like socialists to the extreme) would be saying that I should be taxed to pay for it FOR you if I just happen to make more money for you. THAT is where I have a problem. I pay my own way through the sweat of my brow. I shouldn't have to pay it for others who don't work. I'm not referring to you personally (again) - I'm referring to the grtoup that are life-long welfare reciepients. I'm referring to people that have the mentality that they are OWED a check - without working - because......... Well, I've never understood their reasoning so I can't finish that sentence.
Not true. Currently, the richest 2% of this country pay less, based on percentages, than the poorest(yet still working) 2% How does that work? If you make $50,000 a year, and pay 10% in income tax(just an easy number to calculate, not accurate), you're left with $45,000 a year to live with. If I make $12,000, and pay 10%, it leaves me $10,800 to live on. As it stands right now, your $50,000 earns you extra tax breaks, and extra tax credits, meaning you would only pay HALF of your 10%. So you make 5times as much money...and pay the same dollar figure in taxes. That makes sense to you? I cannot fathom how that makes sense...
Further...you scream about socialism and all this other crap...You have not once in either this thread or the "other" thread addressed many strong, valid, and valuable arguments that smack your "facts" to the ground. When you gonna stop yelling and start talking? When you gonna stop with the paranoid delusions, the name-calling, the partisan catch-phrases, and the false accusations and actually start discussing the issues in a reasonable and realistic manner using actual FACT to support your claims and back up your position?
Never mind. You can't do that. If you tried to do that, you would actually have to check your facts. Then you would find out that they are NOT facts, but really rumours started as scare tactics by republicans in an effort to stop any change. Of course, once you find that out you would be forced to realize that you actually HAVE NO ARGUMENT, and not a leg to stand on, because everything you are saying is JUST PLAIN WRONG...
Sorry to ruin your day...but I AM a dirty, filthy liberal with my hand deep in your pocket while my lazy-ass eats cheetos on the couch waiting for a handout...You shoulda seen it coming...